Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26243434eba2407

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did Recreation.gov go to therapy? It had a lot of site issues.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Recreation.gov
Type of site
Travel planning and reservation service
Available inEnglish
OwnerUnited States federal government
URLwww.recreation.gov (English)
Current statusActive

Recreation.gov is the United States government's centralized online reservation system and travel planning platform. First conceived as an information sharing service in 1995, Recreation.gov is used by 9 federal agencies to offer reservation booking; an additional 5 agencies share data with the platform.[1][2] Recreation.gov is developed and run by Booz Allen Hamilton, a government contractor, and managed in collaboration with a government team staffed by participating agencies.[1][3]

The website allows for booking tent camping and RV sites across the United States, as well as tour tickets, timed-entry tickets, day use areas, and wilderness permits. The site has listings for 4,200 facilities and activities and over 113,000 individual reservable sites across the United States according to the website in 2021.[citation needed]

Participating agencies

[edit]

Agencies that offer reservations on Recreation.gov include:[4]

Agencies that share information with Recreation.gov include:

Governance and contract

[edit]

The United States Forest Service has stated that the current Recreation.gov contractor operates under a competitively awarded, performance-based contract, and that the most recent contract was awarded to Booz Allen in 2016.[5] The Forest Service has also said that reservation service fees are collected by the federal government and sent to the United States Department of the Treasury, which then reimburses the contractor pursuant to the terms of the contract, while a portion of the collected fees is distributed to the agencies that offer reservations on the system.[5]

Criticism

[edit]

In 2022, the Bureau of Land Management was sued by Thomas Kotab, who argued that the fees that Recreation.gov charges violate the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act.[6] The District Court found that the fees were improperly administered due to a lack of public comment period, but the fees were not changed.[7]

In 2023, seven plaintiffs filed a class-action against Booz Allen Hamilton in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging that BAH was charging junk fees that they deceived visitors into thinking would go toward public land management.[3] Six months later, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case.[6]

In 2023, Senators Chuck Grassley and John Barrasso sent letters to the United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Department of the Interior questioning the transparency of the Booz Allen contract and the structure of transaction fees on Recreation.gov.[8] The senators asked how much Booz Allen had been paid to operate the platform, whether transaction-fee amounts were specified in the contract, how much the public had been charged in related fees since 2017, and what steps the departments had taken to disclose the fee structure to users.[8]

In 2024, Senator Alex Padilla introduced the Review and Evaluation of Strategies for Equitable Reservations for Visitor Experiences (RESERVE) Federal Land Act to the Senate, which, among other things, would direct the National Academy of Sciences to "investigate the fee structure and transparency of Recreation.gov."[9] The bill passed in December 2024 but failed in the House; it was reintroduced in the House in May 2025.[6]

Recreation.gov has also been criticized for failing to prevent scraper bots from purchasing permits.[6]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 "FAQ". Recreation.gov. Retrieved 2026-03-11.
  2. "Recreation.gov: Overview and Issues for Congress". www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2026-05-30.
  3. 1 2 Pohle, Allison (2023-04-06). "National Park Visits Are Surging, and One Firm Is Making Unexpected Millions". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2026-05-30.
  4. "About Us". Recreation.gov. Retrieved 2025-02-10.
  5. 1 2 "USFS to Grassley, Boozman - Booz Allen Contract" (PDF). Office of Senator Chuck Grassley. Retrieved 2026-03-11.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Hansman, Heather. "The US Built a Site to Ensure Fair Access to Public Lands. Then Everything Went Wrong". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2026-05-30.
  7. "Coalition Speaks with NPT About Recreation.gov Fees – The Coalition To Protect America's National Parks". 2023-02-21. Retrieved 2026-05-30.
  8. 1 2 "2023-05-25 CEG to USDA and DOI (Booz Allen Contract)" (PDF). Office of Senator Chuck Grassley. Retrieved 2026-03-11.
  9. "Padilla Announces Bill to Improve Equity and Transparency in Reservation Systems for Public Lands". Senator Alex Padilla. Retrieved 2026-05-30.