Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40d9be7990c2947

Jump to content

Purse Strings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Purse Strings
Chili Bouchier and Gyles Isham in the film
Directed byHenry Edwards
Written byBernard Parry (play)
Produced byHerbert Wilcox
Starring
CinematographyHenry Harris
Production
company
Distributed byParamount British Pictures
Release date
  • July 1933 (1933-07)
Running time
69 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish

Purse Strings is a 1933 British drama film directed by Henry Edwards and starring Chili Bouchier, Gyles Isham and Allan Jeayes.[1] It was written by Bernard Parry based on his play, and was made as a quota quickie at British and Dominion's Elstree Studios.[2][3]

Preservation status

[edit]

The British Film Institute National Archive holds a collection of ephemera and stills but no film or video materials.[1]

Plot

[edit]

Mary Willmore, a young wife whose wealthy husband Jim refuses to give her a proper allowance, turns, in desparation, to shoplifting. She is caught, and the store owner, Walford, tries to force her to become his mistress by threatening prosecution. When she confesses to Jim, in his anger he libels Walford, and in an out-of-court settlement he avoids payment by declaring himself bankrupt and signing his income over to Mary... who then holds the purse strings.[4]

Cast

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

Film Weekly wrote: "An unpretentious British picture with elements of originality. The story idea is excellent, and it is a great pity the producers have falled to make the most of it. What might have been a thoroughly good and original film is handicapped by casual treatment and direction. ... Both humour and human melodrama emerge naturally from the narrative, but the direction is uninspired and the acting just inoderately competent in most cases. This is a film which should be made all over again on a much more ambitious scale."[5]

The Daily Film Renter wrote: "Though for greater part story is of serious problem type, last reel degenerates into near farce. Nearly all dialogue. Mechanical production, adequately made. ... General production qualities are adequate, but the story drags, and is just a lot of talk."[6]

Kine Weekly wrote: "An unpretentious marital drama which has a reasonable and original theme, one which, unfortunately, has not been exploited to the fullest advantage. However, there is much in the play to interest women, and especially married women, and it is this potent angle which should assure it some measure of success as a second feature."[4]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 "Purse Strings". British Film Institute Collections Search. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
  2. ↑ Wood, Linda (1986). British Films, 1927–1939 (PDF). British Film Institute. p. 79. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2022.
  3. ↑ Chibnall, Steve (2007). Quota Quickies: The Birth of the British 'B' Film. British Film Institute. p. 275. ISBN 978-1844571550.
  4. 1 2 "Purse Strings". Kine Weekly. 197 (1370): 19. 20 July 1933. ProQuest 2338263477.
  5. ↑ "Purse Strings". Film Weekly. 11 (276): 37. 26 January 1934. ProQuest 1771154209.
  6. ↑ "Purse Strings". The Daily Film Renter (1996): 6. 15 July 1933. ProQuest 2594658327.
[edit]