Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a41534b4cea8cf66

Jump to content

Proffer agreement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In United States criminal law, a proffer agreement, proffer letter, proffer, or "Queen for a Day" letter is a written agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant or prospective witness that allows the defendant or witness to give the prosecutor information about an alleged crime, while limiting the prosecutor's ability to use that information against said defendant or witness.[1]

As part of the agreement, the subject may agree to create a statement, known as a proffer statement, setting out their testimony. A meeting in which proffer agreements and statements are negotiated or set out is called a proffer session.[2] The proffer testimony may be recorded as video evidence, in which case it is known as a proffer video.[3]

A proffer does not ensure immunity; however, it often involves a deal for leniency. For instance, a defendant might secure a recommendation for a lighter sentence or other significant advantages in return for providing valuable and truthful information.[4]

Risks

[edit]

Although the statement from the proffer agreement may not be used by the prosecutors, it often results in discovery of new evidence, which may be used. Many defendants are reluctant to engage in a proffer agreement for this reason.[5][6]

Examples

[edit]

Examples of proffer agreements include:

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Phillips, Richard M., ed. (1997). The Securities Enforcement Manual : Tactics and Strategies. Chicago: American Bar Association. pp. 317–318. ISBN 978-1-57073-423-6 – via Internet Archive.
  2. ↑ Avergun, Jodi L.; Cohan, Douglas. "Explaining the Inexplicable: The Perks and the Perils of Proffer Sessions and Best Practices for Explaining it All to Your Client" (PDF). cadwalader.com. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  3. 1 2 Rubin, Olivia; Steakin, Will (November 13, 2023). "'The boss is not going to leave': Proffer videos show ex-Trump lawyers telling Georgia prosecutors about efforts to overturn 2020 election". ABC News. Retrieved 2023-11-16.
  4. ↑ "Proffer Agreement". federalcriminaldefenseadvocates.com. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  5. ↑ Santos, Michael (2021-11-04). "Can A Proffer Agreement Be Used Against You?". Prison Professors. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  6. ↑ "Understanding The Risks Of Proffers". Law Office of Joseph Abrams. 2023-05-30. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  7. ↑ Protess, Ben; Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (2023-06-28). "Giuliani Sat for Voluntary Interview in Jan. 6 Investigation". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2026-09-13.
  8. ↑ Katzberg, Robert (2023-06-29). "Does Rudy Giuliani's "Proffer" Mean He's About to Flip Against Trump?". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 2023-10-21.
  9. ↑ Sheth, Sonam. "2 of Trump's co-defendants pushed for speedy trials in Georgia. Now both have turned against him". Business Insider. Retrieved 2023-10-21.
  10. ↑ Jung, Jaewon (October 5, 2023). "Deal made between California authorities and 'Keefe D' could affect prosecution in Tupac case". KTNV. Retrieved 2023-10-21.
  11. ↑ Yan, Holly; Casarez, Jean; Sayers, Devon M. (October 18, 2023). "Joran van der Sloot admits to killing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway, judge says". CNN. Archived from the original on 18 October 2023.

See also

[edit]