Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23306c049e50acb

Jump to content

Primary constraint

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The distinction between primary and secondary constraints is not a very fundamental one. It depends very much on the original Lagrangian which we start off with. Once we have gone over to the Hamiltonian formalism, we can really forget about the distinction between primary and secondary constraints.[1]

In Hamiltonian mechanics, a primary constraint is a relation between the coordinates and momenta that holds without using the equations of motion.[2] A secondary constraint is one that is not primary—in other words it holds when the equations of motion are satisfied, but need not hold if they are not satisfied[3] The secondary constraints arise from the condition that the primary constraints should be preserved in time. A few authors use more refined terminology, where the non-primary constraints are divided into secondary, tertiary, quaternary, etc. constraints. The secondary constraints arise directly from the condition that the primary constraints are preserved by time, the tertiary constraints arise from the condition that the secondary ones are also preserved by time, and so on. Primary and secondary constraints were introduced by Anderson and Bergmann[4] and developed by Dirac.[5][6][7][8]

The terminology of primary and secondary constraints is confusingly similar to that of first- and second-class constraints. These divisions are independent: both first- and second-class constraints can be either primary or secondary, so this gives altogether four different classes of constraints.

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. Dirac 1964, p. 43.
  2. Dirac 1964, p. 8.
  3. Dirac 1964, p. 14.
  4. Anderson & Bergmann 1951, p. 1019.
  5. Dirac, Paul A. M. (1950). "Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics". Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 2: 129–148. doi:10.4153/CJM-1950-012-1. ISSN 0008-414X. MR 0043724. S2CID 119748805.
  6. Dirac, Paul A. M. (1958). "Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 246 (1246): 326–332. Bibcode:1958RSPSA.246..326D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0141. ISSN 0962-8444. JSTOR 100496. MR 0094205. S2CID 122175789.
  7. Dirac, Paul A. M. (1958). "The theory of gravitation in Hamiltonian form". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 246 (1246): 333–343. Bibcode:1958RSPSA.246..333D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0142. ISSN 0962-8444. JSTOR 100497. MR 0094206. S2CID 122053391.
  8. Dirac 1964.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]