Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a231150f1d7618aa

Jump to content

Ohuan

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ohuan
19th Oba of the Kingdom of Benin
Front-facing brass relief of a standing nude youth with a large head, ridged close-fitting cap, deep ringed collar, bracelets and anklets. Fine cross-hatching patterns the torso and legs; the arms hang at the sides, and three raised rosettes remain on the worn, broken plaque.
Edo brass relief plaque from the Kingdom of Benin, depicting a naked youth connected in Benin art with oral traditions of Odogbo's naked procession before his accession as Ohuan.
Oba of the Kingdom of Benin
Reignc.1606 – c. 1640 or 1641
PredecessorEhengbuda
SuccessorAhenzae
BornOdogbo
Diedc. 1630, 1640, or 1641
(disputed)
IssueNone
Regnal name
Ohuan
HouseEweka I
FatherEhengbuda
MotherOhogha

Ohuan (also rendered Ongwa, Ouan and Ohuon; born Odogbo) was the nineteenth Oba ('king') of the Kingdom of Benin. He succeeded his father, Ehengbuda, in the early seventeenth century. The chronology of his reign is uncertain: proposed dates range from about 1606 to 1640 or 1641, while another chronology places it approximately between 1610 and 1630. His reign occurred during a period in which the Oba ceased personally commanding military expeditions and senior chiefs, particularly the Iyase[a] or commander-in-chief, gained military and political authority. Ohuan was Ehengbuda's only son and was known as Odogbo before taking his regnal name. Oral traditions differ in their descriptions of his sex and appearance. Some accounts portray him as an attractive or effeminate young man who was mistaken for a woman; others state that he was born female and became male through medicine. According to one widely recorded tradition, Ehengbuda required Odogbo to walk naked from Uselu to the Benin capital to demonstrate publicly that he was male and therefore eligible to rule. The procession was associated with the origin of the ifieto, ceremonial attendants who still perform before royal processions. Traditions also state that Ohuan's mother, named Ohogha in one account, was not installed as Iyoba ('queen mother') after his accession.

A political event associated with Ohuan's reign was his conflict with Iyase Ogina, a military chief appointed during Ehengbuda's reign. Ogina exercised authority independently of the palace and rebelled shortly after Ohuan's accession. Ohuan temporarily withdrew to Evbohuan, where he assembled supporters before defeating Ogina, recovering control of the capital and exiling him to Okogo. Some traditions subsequently describe Ohuan's government as peaceful and credit him with founding settlements, even though surviving accounts differ sharply in their assessments of his character. Ohuan died without children and left no brother or uncontested direct heir. His death was followed by disputed successions among distant branches of the royal family. Later Benin art, Igue festival practices, shrine traditions and coronation songs drew on accounts of his appearance and public procession, as well as his childlessness.

Background and chronology

[edit source]

Historical accounts differ in their dating of Ohuan's reign. Historian Jacob Egharevba placed his accession around 1606 and assigned him a thirty-three-year reign ending in 1641.[1] Historian Osarhieme Osadolor similarly dated Ohuan's accession to about 1606 and his reign to approximately 1606–1640.[2] Anthropologist Percy Amaury Talbot dated Ohuan's accession to around 1610, identified him as Ehengbuda's son and successor, and placed the accession of his successor Ehenzai at about 1630.[3] Historical accounts generally place his reign from the early 17th century until around 1640. Anthropologist Paula Ben-Amos, however, suggests he may have died as early as 1630.[4][5] Anthropologists Peter Roese and Dmitri Bondarenko recorded informants who assigned Ohuan only a brief reign, observing that their accounts associated few major events with him.[5]

Talbot's chronology places Ohuan's accession after a period in which European travellers described the Benin capital as large and orderly. Talbot reproduced a description from 1601 portraying the city as approached by a broad, straight, unpaved road, with earthworks, a deep dry ditch, trees, suburbs and regularly arranged houses. He stated that horses were used in warfare at that time, although they could not survive in the later tsetse-infested bush, and linked a formerly larger population to surviving walled settlements and signs of more cultivation.[6]

Royal traditions connect the end of Ehengbuda's reign with changes in the distribution of political and military power in Benin. Ben-Amos and John Thornton wrote that one tradition attributed to Ehengbuda a rule preventing the execution of the Uwangue, one of the three leading administrative officeholders, thereby limiting an earlier royal power over subjects.[7] The same traditions state that Ehengbuda barred the Oba ('king') from personally leading military expeditions and transferred that responsibility to the Iyase.[a] Dutch and German reports from the period referred, respectively, to a military captain in 1602 and a general leading Benin forces in a campaign against Lagos. Ben-Amos and Thornton interpreted the separate command structure and the later Iyase rebellion as indications that the Oba had ceded control over part of the state's affairs.[9]

Early life and accession

[edit source]

Egharevba identified Ohuan as Odogbo, Ehengbuda's only son, who was placed on the Benin throne after his father's death.[10] Academic Sweet Ufumwen Ebeigbe likewise described Odogbo as Ehengbuda's sole son and heir before he took the regnal name Ohuan.[11] Several oral traditions address Odogbo's sex or appearance before his accession.[12][13] Egharevba described Odogbo as attractive and girlish in appearance, leading people to assume that he was female.[10] Another version of the tradition states that Odogbo was born female and changed into a male through medicine.[12][13] Anthropologist Robert Bradbury distinguished this version from an account in which Odogbo was said to have appeared effeminate.[12]

Egharevba recounted that Ehengbuda instructed Odogbo to walk naked from Uselu to the Benin capital in order to demonstrate publicly that he was male.[10] Odogbo's attendants were also naked, and their hair was cut and arranged before the procession began. Egharevba wrote that Odogbo and the attendants became known as ifieto ('hair curlers'), and stated that they continued to dance and sing ceremonially before royal processions.[14] Roese and Bondarenko similarly associated the procession with the establishment of the ifieto title and reported that titleholders continued to appear at ceremonial events.[5] Anthropologist Armand Duchâteau interpreted traditions of Ohuan's appearance and public exposure as evidence that Edo society questioned his fitness to rule because of his feminine traits.[13] Ben-Amos and Thornton interpreted the tradition of a female-born Odogbo becoming male as a symbolic transgression of royal norms, since women were barred from ruling in Benin.[15] Ebeigbe also linked the account with the exclusion of women from the Benin throne.[11]

Mother and the Iyoba institution

[edit source]

The Iyoba ('queen mother') was normally installed as an Oba's mother about three years after his accession, after which she was sent to Lower Uselu to reside in Eguae-Iyoba ('queen mother's court').[16] Egharevba stated that when the mother of an Edaiken ('crown prince') died before her son became Oba, her body could be embalmed and later reburied with the title and honours of Iyoba. Within this institutional context, Egharevba reported that Ohuan did not send his mother to Uselu.[16] Roese and Bondarenko recorded an oral account naming Ohuan's mother as Ohogha and locating her home at Ayen or Uyen. According to that tradition, Ohogha was not installed as Iyoba after Ohuan's accession; instead, she returned to her home village with valuable gifts. The narrative attributed this exclusion to her alleged failure to bear a "proper" male heir. Roese and Bondarenko also reported an Ayen custom in which descendants of Ohogha's family received one leg from every slaughtered animal.[17]

Conflict with Iyase Ogina

[edit source]

The principal political conflict associated with Ohuan's reign was the uprising led by Iyase Ogina.[14][18] Accounts differ regarding when the rebellion began: Egharevba placed it at Ohuan's accession, Roese and Bondarenko situated it immediately afterward, and Osadolor dated it three years after Ohuan took the throne.[14][17][2] Roese and Bondarenko described Ogina as an Iyase appointed by Ohuan's father Ehengbuda and as originating from Okogo, a village near the Benin capital.[17] Egharevba wrote that Ogina had opposed Ehengbuda and committed adultery with one of Ehengbuda's wives.[14] Roese and Bondarenko recorded a more detailed oral tradition in which Ogina had sex with Ohogha while she had been placed in his care during pregnancy and childbirth. In that version, Ehengbuda did not execute Ogina because of Ogina's popularity and power, but commissioned a brass cast showing Ogina and Ohogha with the infant prince beside them. The tradition further states that this cast was entrusted to the Iwebo palace society[b] and was intended to be shown to Odogbo only after his installation as Oba.[17]

Osadolor described Ogina as the first Iyase to serve as commander-in-chief of the Benin army during Ohuan's rule.[22] He stated that Ogina drew support from other chiefs and political groups, accumulated state power, and convened councils at his own palace rather than that of the Oba. Osadolor interpreted the confrontation as a continuation of the conflict between Ehengbuda and the earlier Iyase Ekpennede.[2] Egharevba stated that Ohuan retreated to Evbohuan, also spelled Evbohnan, for several months to assemble sufficient forces before attacking Ogina. Osadolor further explained that during this interval Ohuan used the refuge as a base from which to gather supporters for military action against the Iyase and his faction.[14][2] Roese and Bondarenko likewise wrote that Ohuan had to leave the capital for Evbohuan, a settlement associated with his name, before assembling allies. In the traditions they examined, Ohuan's recovery was attributed to magical power.[17] Ohuan ultimately overcame Ogina, re-established control in the capital and exiled Ogina to Okogo, also spelled Okogbo.[14][2] Egharevba and Roese and Bondarenko both reported that Ogina later died and was deified.[14][17] Osadolor characterised the rest of Ohuan's reign as peaceful after the "great struggle", while treating the confrontation as influential in Benin military history.[2] Egharevba described Ohuan as an accomplished herbalist and maker of charms, crediting him with wise government, the founding of towns and villages, and the respect of his subjects.[14] Roese and Bondarenko observed that elsewhere Egharevba described Ohuan as hateful, vengeful and tyrannical, a characterisation at odds with the more favourable account in A Short History of Benin.[23] Egharevba also attributed the creation of the Obahanye title to Ohuan.[24]

Kingship and military authority

[edit source]

Osadolor dated the period in which Obas ceased personally leading military campaigns from Ohuan's accession around 1606 until the reign of Akengbuda in 1804. He argued that Benin chiefs made decisions that removed the Oba from direct command while increasing the power of administrative and military officeholders. In his interpretation, the Oba became more secluded within the palace as a ritual figure, while retaining divine authority as the Uku Akpolokpolo ('the mighty that rules'). Osadolor nevertheless stressed that rebellions, conflicts and manipulation by chiefs weakened the monarchy despite constitutional arrangements that formally placed chiefs below the Oba.[25] Osadolor considered power, position and prestige to be the principal incentives behind seventeenth- and eighteenth-century conflicts between kings and chiefs.[26] He maintained that after losing direct military command, the Oba's control over title appointments and the creation of palace and town offices became a major political instrument. Osadolor also associated political instability with economic insecurity and treated both as conditions preceding later civil wars in Benin. He argued that military developments in this period resulted primarily from internal political developments, rather than only from the European slave trade.[27]

Osadolor stated that during the era of warrior kings, the Iyase had served as general commander beside the Oba.[28] Though the Iyase as commander-in-chief was theoretically appointed by and dependent upon the Oba, Osadolor argued that the king in practice lost effective control over the army chief.[22] He interpreted the absence of further Iyase appointments by Obas for the rest of the seventeenth century as a strategy intended to prevent another powerful rival from emerging.[2] Osadolor linked the aftermath of Ohuan's conflict to the development of non-command military functions for senior members of the Eghaevbo n'Ore ('town chiefs'), including the Esogban, Eson, and Osuma.[29] The Esogban, who ranked immediately after the Iyase within the Eghaevbo n'Ore hierarchy, was associated with the Oba's security during wartime and was required to stay with the Oba when the Iyase went to war. Osadolor wrote that the Esogban neither commanded troops nor acted as a front commander, but functioned as the political head of the Benin capital and was responsible for the shrine of Edion Edo, the ancestors of Benin. The Eson, third in the hierarchy, could act for the Iyase when that post was unoccupied, coordinating unit commanders without becoming deputy commander-in-chief. Osadolor regarded the Eson's military role as mainly honorary because the Ezomo, the senior war commander of the metropolitan regiment, increasingly provided the army's practical leadership.[30]

Death and succession

[edit source]

Ohuan died childless, leaving neither a son nor a brother who could serve as an uncontested heir.[14][31] Egharevba wrote that after Ohuan's death the throne rotated among separate branches of the royal family through six reigns. In his account, Ahenzae, a great-grandson of Oba Orhogbua, succeeded Ohuan and was sixteen years old at his coronation. Egharevba stated that Ahenzae's youth enabled others to squander royal property and gamble away royal coral beads in dice games with Osuan.[14] Talbot offered another sequence in which Ohuan was followed around 1630 by a relative named Ehenzai, who was in turn succeeded about 1650 by Akengbayi, identified as Ehenzai's son or brother.[3] Ben-Amos and Thornton wrote that royal genealogies for the later seventeenth century differed over the names and succession sequence following Ohuan's death.[15] Historical accounts list rulers whose genealogical relationships were disputed for this era as Ahenzae, Akenzae, Akengboi, Ahenkpaye, Akengbedo, Oreoghene and Ewuakpe.[2] Ben-Amos and Thornton mentioned traditions recalling Ahenkpaye's deposition and Ahenzae's gambling away of the royal coral beads.[15]

Ben-Amos and Thornton argued that Egharevba understated the depth of the succession crisis by framing it as alternation among royal branches.[32] They contended that distant relatives of uncertain or undocumented genealogical connection competed for the throne, thereby weakening the monarchy. They also reported traditions in which the core royal line of Oranmiyan, the founder said to have come from Ife, who married an Edo woman and fathered Eweka I, was understood to have ended after Ohuan's death. A version collected by ethnologist Mechthildis Jungwirth instead held that the royal line came close to extinction during Ohuan's reign but was preserved.[15] In a 1981 communication cited by Ben-Amos and Thornton, chief Ihama of the Ihogbe[c] explained the short reigns of the Obas between Ohuan and Ewuakpe by saying that they lacked divine ordination because they came from distant branches of the royal family.[34] Ben-Amos and Thornton related this account to Edo beliefs that Obas were reincarnations of earlier rulers within a lineage, so candidates from remote branches were regarded as less legitimate within that framework. They treated the tradition as evidence for a seventeenth-century legitimacy crisis, while acknowledging that it might be a later interpretation of earlier events.[35]

Ben-Amos described the seventeenth century as an era of dynastic turmoil, in which factions competed for the kingship after Ohuan's death. She wrote that Ewuakpe later reached an agreement with rebellious chiefs and reintroduced direct succession, although the conflict continued into the eighteenth century. Ben-Amos identified Akenzua I and Eresoyen as later rulers who attempted to suppress rebellious chiefs and restore royal authority and legitimacy. She interpreted artistic forms connected with those Obas as evidence of efforts to renew the monarchy.[4] Roese and Bondarenko reported that Ohuan's death without an heir led to a search for a successor among the Enigie, princes whose ancestors had been sent from the royal line to govern settlements. They further stated that the extinction of Ohuan's direct line was recalled during Oba Eweka II's coronation in 1914, when Ekasa dancers sang that royal succession should not end as it had threatened to do in Ohuan's time.[23]

Oral tradition, art, and commemoration

[edit source]

Duchâteau connected images of nude youths in Benin art with oral traditions of Odogbo's later accession as Ohuan. He contrasted the narrative of Ohuan as female-born and altered through medicine with accounts describing him as beautiful and maidenly in his appearance. Duchâteau interpreted the public route from Uselu to the Benin capital as a ritual presentation arranged by Ehengbuda to address doubts about Ohuan's sex.[13] Ebeigbe identified a figural form in Benin art as representing Odogbo before he became Ohuan. She wrote that the nude procession was recalled through Igue festival ritual and Benin art.[11] Ebeigbe stated that Odogbo could appear as a nude male figure to stress masculinity, or as a female figure to refer to uncertainty surrounding Odogbo's true gender.[36]

Roese and Bondarenko described a structure on Ebo Street in present-day Benin City locally called aro Ehengbuda ('Ehengbuda's shrine), where tradition located Ohuan's transformation. They stated that they could not enter because the location continued to be treated locally as a sacred site. Their description included an atrium with an impluvium, an iroko tree identified as Chlorophora excelsa, and an Obokha or Okha tree identified as Ceiba pentandra. They also reported that a priest was said to have overseen the shrine's charms and a sacred python during the early 1970s.[5] One version of the shrine narrative collected by Roese and Bondarenko identified Inin of Udo as the person who prepared the medicines for Ohuan's transformation.[37] In that account, Ohuan stayed inside the building for seven days, then was told to expose the body above an opening and receive an object into it. Reported variants identify the object as a mouse, rat or snake, the last of which the authors associated with the shrine's sacred python.[17] Roese and Bondarenko regarded the question of whether Ohuan was intersex as unresolved.[5]

Ohuan's lack of a direct heir was also incorporated into later ceremony. Roese and Bondarenko reported that an Ekasa song performed at Eweka II's coronation recalled the danger of the royal line ending, with Ohuan's reign serving as the historical precedent.[23] Ben-Amos and Thornton cited a comparable coronation tradition collected by Jungwirth, in which the royal line was said to have approached extinction during Ohuan's time.[15]

European accounts and regional context

[edit source]

In Talbot's chronology, an unidentified Benin king sent a son to Jesuit missionaries in Sierra Leone in 1606 for baptism and instruction, while inviting them to Benin.[6] Talbot also reproduced a 1608 report of Baltasar Barreira being received by a Benin king described as lord of seven kingdoms and chief king of the coast. In that report, the king issued an edict ordering unmarried virgins to cover their genitals. He attended a Catholic mass from outside the church and listened to a Portuguese sermon. While he initially appeared favourable to Christianity, he later changed his position under Muslim influence. Talbot stated that Barreira died in 1612. He also wrote that Capuchins from the Province of Britain began travelling toward Guinea in 1634, though it was uncertain whether they reached Benin before the 1648 mission led by Angelo di Valenzia.[3] Talbot reported that Capuchins from Castille were dispatched to Nigritia in 1659, probably Benin, but later withdrew after failing to establish a mission they believed the king had used to pursue trade with Spain. He further stated that later Capuchin activity in Benin after 1667 ceased when Dutch forces took Portuguese factories.[3]

Roese and Bondarenko considered it possible that the Itsekiri became separate from Benin during Ohuan's reign, provided that his rule extended to 1641, despite Benin court traditions sharing little detail on the matter. They cited a 1691 letter by Capuchin missionary priest Padre Francesco de Monteleone that referred to border clashes and a break in ambassadorial exchanges between Benin and the Itsekiri. They also cited David van Nyendael's 1668 description of Warri as an independent kingdom, whose ruler treated the Oba of Benin as a neighbour and ally rather than as a superior.[23]

Historiography

[edit source]

Ben-Amos and Thornton argued that Egharevba's published narrative changed or excluded aspects of oral tradition that could be regarded as embarrassing to the Benin royal family. They specifically identified omitted traditions concerning royal adultery and a reduced account of seventeenth-century political instability. Their interpretation of Ohuan's succession crisis therefore differs from Egharevba's model of orderly rotation among royal branches.[32] Bradbury considered that writer Olfert Dapper's "Kambadje" might refer to Ohuan's father Ehengbuda, and that the son mentioned in Dapper's report could have been Ohuan. On this tentative reading, Bradbury mentioned the contrast between Dapper's claim that Kambadje had one thousand wives and the tradition that Ohuan died without children.[12] Duchâteau observed that Dapper had not visited Africa and compiled his 1668 work from available oral and written reports.[13]

Differences among Egharevba, Talbot, Ben-Amos, Osadolor, and Roese and Bondarenko leave Ohuan's exact dates, the duration of his reign and elements of the succession sequence unresolved.[1][3][4][2][38]

Explanatory notes

[edit source]
  1. 1 2 The Iyase was usually the commander-in-chief of the Benin warriors, followed by the Ezomo and the Ologbosere and Imaran.[8]
  2. The Oba's household was organised into three distinct associations, each responsible for particular aspects of palace life.[19] The first, Iwebo, originally managed clothing and regalia for the Oba.[20] Over time, its duties expanded to include oversight of financial and trading matters, under the authority of the Uwangue, a title linked to Ewedo. The second group, Iweguae, consisted of attendants and domestic servants, led by the Esere. The third, Ibiwe, was tasked with serving the Oba's wives and children, and its senior chief, Osodin, is traditionally traced back to Ewedo's time.[21]
  3. The Ihogbe are the worshippers of the Oba's ancestors and recorders of the departed Obas.[33]

References

[edit source]

Citations

[edit source]
  1. 1 2 Egharevba 1968, pp. 33–34.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Osadolor 2001, p. 145.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Talbot 1926, p. 162.
  4. 1 2 3 Ben-Amos 1995, p. 45.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Roese & Bondarenko 2003, p. 178.
  6. 1 2 Talbot 1926, p. 160.
  7. Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, pp. 364–365.
  8. Egharevba 1968, p. 80.
  9. Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, p. 365.
  10. 1 2 3 Egharevba 1968, p. 33.
  11. 1 2 3 Ebeigbe 2014, p. 253.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Bradbury 1973, p. 31.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Duchâteau 1994, p. 20.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Egharevba 1968, p. 34.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, p. 363.
  16. 1 2 Egharevba 1968, p. 75.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Roese & Bondarenko 2003, p. 179.
  18. Osadolor 2001, pp. 128, 145.
  19. Ryder 1969, p. 5.
  20. Ryder 1969, pp. 5–6.
  21. Ryder 1969, p. 6.
  22. 1 2 Osadolor 2001, pp. 144–145.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Roese & Bondarenko 2003, p. 180.
  24. Egharevba 1968, p. 77.
  25. Osadolor 2001, p. 127.
  26. Osadolor 2001, pp. 127–128.
  27. Osadolor 2001, p. 128.
  28. Osadolor 2001, p. 144.
  29. Osadolor 2001, pp. 145–146.
  30. Osadolor 2001, p. 146.
  31. Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, pp. 357, 363.
  32. 1 2 Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, p. 357.
  33. Egharevba 1968, p. 79.
  34. Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, pp. 363–364.
  35. Ben-Amos & Thornton 2001, p. 364.
  36. Ebeigbe 2014, pp. 253–254.
  37. Roese & Bondarenko 2003, pp. 178–179.
  38. Roese & Bondarenko 2003, pp. 178–180.

Works cited

[edit source]