Neglected firm effect
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The neglected firm effect is the market anomaly phenomenon of lesser-known firms producing abnormally high returns on their stocks. The companies that are followed by fewer analysts will earn higher returns on average than companies that are followed by many analysts. The abnormally high return exhibited by neglected firms may be due to the lower liquidity or higher risks associated with the stock. At the same time, the impact on returns,[1] and regarding earnings management is not always clear.[2]
According to Investopedia: [3] "Neglected firms are usually the small firms that analysts tend to ignore. Information available on these companies tends to be limited to those items that are required by law, on the other hand, have a higher profile, which provides large amounts of high quality information (in addition to legally required forms) to institutional investors such as pension or mutual fund companies."
References
[edit]- ↑ Zuckerman, Ezra W. (18 May 1999). "The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount". American Journal of Sociology. 104 (5): 1398–1438. doi:10.1086/210178. JSTOR 10.1086/210178. S2CID 143734005.
- ↑ Laura Lindsey, Simona Mola (2013).Analyst Competition and Monitoring: Earnings Management in Neglected Firms, DERA Working Paper 2013-04
- ↑ Adam Hayes (2022). Neglected Firm Effect
 | This finance-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information. |