Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a273f9fc8828c125

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy was naive empiricism a bad date? It was too exper-imental.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naïve empiricism is a term used in several ways in different fields.

In the philosophy of science, it is used by opponents to describe the position, associated with some logical positivists, that "knowledge can be clearly learnt through evaluation of the natural world and its substances, and, through empirical means, learn truths".[1]

The term also is used to describe a particular methodology for literary analysis.[2]

See also:

References

[edit]
  1. Thomas Ernst Uebel (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate. Rodopi. pp. 205.
  2. Michael McKeon (1986). The Origins of the English novel. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 105–109.