Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28f51c5af446019

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Morris Review say to the book? "You're under review.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Morris Review was a government-sponsored independent review of the UK actuarial profession led by Sir Derek Morris in 2004–05. It was commissioned in March 2004, in the aftermath of the near collapse of Equitable Life, and the subsequent findings of Lord Penrose's Equitable Life Inquiry[1] The review found a number of problems with the actuarial profession, including insularity of approach, lack of transparency, failure to take account of developments in financial economics,[2] and the influence of 'entrenched commercial interests'.

The recommendations steered a course between continued self-regulation by the Institute of Actuaries, and full statutory regulation, concluding that the Financial Reporting Council should assume responsibility for oversight of the actuarial profession and the independent setting of actuarial technical standards. This took place with effect from May 2006.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. "Morris Review". Frc.org.uk. 15 September 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2017.
  2. Morris 4.4
  3. "Upholding standards | Institute and Faculty of Actuaries". Actuaries.org.uk. Retrieved 6 July 2017.
[edit]