Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d218c7e962780

Jump to content

Megastudy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A megastudy or mega-study is a research study in which a large number of different treatments or interventions are tested at the same time, on the same sample or similar samples, using a common outcome measure, and using the same experimental protocol.[1][2][3]

Megastudy examples

[edit]
  • Exercise encouragement[1]
  • Vaccination nudges[4]
  • Strengthening of democratic attitudes[5]
  • Interventions against climate change[3]

Many-lab studies

[edit]

The megastudy technique can be combined with the many-labs approach, so that teams of researchers from across the planet conduct the same experiment locally.[3][6]

Megastudy criticisms

[edit]
  • Statistical power: While the overall megastudy sample size may be large, the sample size per intervention may be relatively small, leading to underpowered designs with wide confidence intervals. As a result, while interventions may be comparable, their relative ranking by outcome measure may be noisy. Increased sample size can help address this issue.[7]
  • Lack of theory: The megastudy technique may be considered a form of "fishing expedition" for what interventions have strongest effect on the outcome measure, without much theory building.[7]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Milkman, Katherine L.; et al. (2021). "Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science". Nature. 600 (7889): 478–483. Bibcode:2021Natur.600..478M. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04128-4. PMC 8822539. PMID 34880497.
  2. Duckworth, Angela L.; Milkman, Katherine L. (2022). "A guide to megastudies". PNAS Nexus (5) pgac214. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac214. PMC 9802435. PMID 36712333.
  3. 1 2 3 Doell, Kimberly C. (2023). "Megastudies to test the efficacy of behavioural interventions". Nature Reviews Psychology. 2 (5): 263. doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00174-z.
  4. Milkman, Katherine L.; et al. (2022). "A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (6) e2115126119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11915126M. doi:10.1073/pnas.2115126119. PMC 8833156. PMID 35105809.
  5. Voelkel, Jan G., et al. "Megastudy identifying successful interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes." Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA (2022). https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/documents/working-papers/2022/wp-22-38.pdf
  6. Pavlov, Yuri G.; Adamian, Nika; Appelhoff, Stefan; Arvaneh, Mahnaz; Benwell, Christopher S. Y.; Beste, Christian; Bland, Amy R.; Bradford, Daniel E.; Bublatzky, Florian; Busch, Niko A.; Clayson, Peter E.; Cruse, Damian; Czeszumski, Artur; Dreber, Anna; Dumas, Guillaume (2021-11-01). "#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments". Cortex. 144: 213–229. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.013. hdl:1885/295623. ISSN 0010-9452. PMID 33965167.
  7. 1 2 Collins J (2022-05-27). "Megastudy scepticism". jasoncollins.blog. Retrieved 2023-12-13.