Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2224ccc3a3f3f27

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeIs MS/8 a good ratio? Yes, it's a byte above the rest.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MS/8
DeveloperRichard F. Lary
Working stateDiscontinued
Initial release1966; 60 years ago (1966)
Available inEnglish
Supported platformsPDP-8
Succeeded byP?S/8, COS-310

MS/8 or The RL Monitor System is a discontinued computer operating system developed for the Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-8 in 1966 by Richard F. Lary.[1][2]

History

[edit]

RL Monitor System, as it was initially called, was developed on a 4K (12-bit) PDP-8 with "a Teletype that had a paper tape reader and punch and .. a single DECtape."[3] It was a disk oriented system, faster than its predecessor, the PDP-8 4K Disk Monitor System, with tricks to make it run quickly on DECtape based systems.

Still named RL, it was submitted to DECUS in 1970.[4]

MS/8 was replaced by P?S/8[5] and COS-310.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. "5/8-1.1a BPAK - A Binary Input/Output Package for the PDP-5". BitSavers. Archived from the original on 2019-09-24. Retrieved 2020-09-30. System 8-466A RL Monitor System (WCFMPG Version)
  2. "RL Monitor System". Archived from the original on 2023-10-05. Retrieved 2020-09-30.
  3. Tom Burniece (August 14, 2015). "Interview of Richard (Richie) Lary, part 1" (PDF). ComputerHistory.org.
  4. "PDP-a" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-17. Retrieved 2020-09-30. Author: Richard Lary, Mario DeNobili, et al. Submitted by: Stanley Rabinowitz, Digital Equipment Corp., Maynard
  5. yes, with a question-mark!
[edit]