Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21c61f6ceeb89da

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did lex scripta say to lex non scripta? "You're not written in stone.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lex scripta (plural: leges scriptae) is a Latin expression that means "written or statutory law". It is in contrast to lex non scripta, customary or common law. The term originates from the Roman legal tradition. Emperor Justinian divided the lex scripta into several categories:[citation needed]

Lex scripta has a lasting effect that can define a legal tradition for a culture such as that found in the Corpus Juris Civilis, Magna Carta, Tang Code, or a country's constitution.

United Kingdom and the United States

[edit]

In the United Kingdom, and later, the United States, Lex Scripta refers to the body of statutory law that amends or changes the common law, especially when effecting common law marriage and other customs.[1] Traditionally, English law, up through the 19th century, was divided into Lex non scripta (common law and customs) and Lex scripta ("written and statute law"), with the Magna Carta being the oldest of the latter.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Mordecai, Samuel Fox (1905). Lex Scripta: A Condensed Summary of the Most Important Acts of Parliament Governing the Subjects Treated of in First and Second Blackstone, with References to the Statutes of North Carolina Covering the Same Ground that Such Acts of Parliament Cover. Retrieved 5 August 2025.
  2. Brewster, Frederick Carroll (1887). Blackstone's Commentaries for American Students in the Form of Questions and Answers: Prefaced by Questions and Answers on the Introduction to Robertson's Charles V, Together with a Note on the Rule in Shelley's Case as Applied to Pennsylvania. pp. 23–25. Retrieved 5 August 2025.