Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22a45496a18c6f8

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the legal constitution say to the law? You're always drafting me.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A legal constitution is a constitution where the judiciary form the greatest check upon the use of executive power. A legal constitution can be contrasted with a political constitution where political accountability is the greatest method of controlling government. In a legal constitution, methods of official review and the striking down of unconstitutional legislation may be used in order to control government power. Whether a move from a political to a legal constitution has occurred in the United Kingdom after the passing of the Human Rights Act has been debated by scholars, including Richard Paul Bellamy.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Bellamy, Richard (1 January 2011). "Political constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 9 (1): 86–111. doi:10.1093/icon/mor024 via Oxford Academic.