Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a241b0bca9355cd4

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did "In the Shadow of Tomorrow" say to today? You're always behind.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the Shadow of Tomorrow
AuthorJohan Huizinga
Original titleIn de schaduwen van morgen
TranslatorJakob Herman Huizinga
LanguageDutch
PublisherH.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon
Publication dateOctober 1935
Publication placeNetherlands
Published in English
1936
Pages230

In the Shadow of Tomorrow: A Diagnosis of the Spiritual Ills of Our Time (Dutch: In de schaduwen van morgen. Een diagnose van het geestelijk lijden van onzen tijd) is a 1935 book by the Dutch writer Johan Huizinga. It is a critical essay about Western culture under modernity, covering issues of war, weakening social structures, decline in cultural expressions, lack of spirit and general worldweariness.[1]

The book was published by H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon in Haarlem in October 1935.[1] It appeared in English in 1936, translated by the author's son Jakob Herman Huizinga.[2]

In the Shadow of Tomorrow was widely discussed for a period and temporarily became more popular than Huizinga's The Autumn of the Middle Ages (1919).[2] It was his best selling work but also his most criticised.[3] The historians Jan Romein, Pieter Geyl and Henk Wesseling have criticised it for analyzing ongoing crises as results of deeper cultural issues rather than economics and politics.[2]

The scholar Henk van den Belt [nl] groups In the Shadow of Tomorrow with José Ortega y Gasset's The Revolt of the Masses (1929) and other interwar-era books of cultural criticism that "expressed deep concerns about the prospects of the humanistic ideals held by a cultural elite to which their authors themselves invariably belonged".[2] Looking at it in retrospect, Belt wrote that the genre "largely became obsolete" in the 1960s "as the fears it expressed turned true".[2] Nora Gosselink similarly groups In the Shadow of Tomorrow with contemporaneous works of cultural pessimism, notably Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West (1918–1922), whose outlook Huizinga initially had rejected but gradually came to adopt.[3]

References

[edit source]
  1. 1 2 Quaglioni, Diego (2019). "The Weakening of Judgement: Johan Huizinga (1872–1945) and the Crisis of the Western Legal Tradition" (PDF). In Tuori, Kaius; Björklund, Heta (eds.). Roman Law and the Idea of Europe. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 181. ISBN 978-1-3500-5873-6. Retrieved 29 July 2026.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Belt, Henk van den (2022). "A "mighty stream" of anti-intellectualism: Johan Huizinga, his age, and ours" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Netherlandic Studies. 42 (1): 27–52. Retrieved 29 July 2026.
  3. 1 2 Gosselink, Nora (2022). "Becoming a Cultural Pessimist: Johan Huizinga's In the Shadow of Tomorrow and The Decline of the West". The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence. 6 (2): 53–61. doi:10.22618/TP.PJCV.20226.2.144.004.