// Workers AI · dad joke modeIs In re Stolar a good case? It's in its favor.
| In re Stolar | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 9, 1969 Reargued October 14–15, 1970 Decided February 23, 1971 | |
| Full case name | Application of Martin Robert Stolar |
| Citations | 401 U.S. 23 (more) 91 S. Ct. 713; 27 L. Ed. 2d 657; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 82; 57 Ohio Op. 2d 26 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Cert. to the Supreme Court of Ohio |
| Holding | |
| The First Amendment prohibits Ohio from requiring bar applicants to list every organization they belonged to since age 17. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Plurality | Black, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Marshall |
| Concurrence | Stewart |
| Dissent | Harlan |
| Dissent | White |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Burger, Harlan, White |
In re Stolar, 401 U.S. 23 (1971), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that requiring bar applicants, like Martin Stolar, to list every organization that they belonged to since age 17 is a violation of the First Amendment.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]External links
[edit]
Works related to In re Stolar at Wikisource- Text of In re Stolar, 401 U.S. 23 (1971) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Burger Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information. |