Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e38ccbf27452a

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did implicit blockmodeling say to its date? You fit my model.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Implicit blockmodeling is an approach in blockmodeling, similar to a valued and homogeneity blockmodeling, where initially an additional normalization is used and then while specifying the parameter of the relevant link is replaced by the block maximum.[1]

This approach was first proposed by Batagelj and Ferligoj in 2000,[2]:16–17 and developed by Aleš Žiberna in 2007/08.[3][4]

Comparing with homogeneity, the implicit blockmodeling will perform similarly with max-regular equivalence, but slightly worse in other settings. It will perform worse than valued and homogeneity blockmodeling with a pre-specified blockmodel.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Žiberna, Aleš (2009). "Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Blockmodeling of Regular Equivalence in Valued Networks by Simulations". Metodološki zvezki. 6 (2): 99–134.
  2. Batagelj, Vladimir; Ferligoj, Anuška (2000). "Clustering relational data". In Gaul, W.; Opitz, O.; Schader, M. (eds.). Data Analysis. Springer Verlag. pp. 3–15.
  3. Aleš Žiberna, Generalized blockmodeling of valued networks (pospološeno bločno modeliranje omrežij z vrednostmi na povezavah: doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2007. URL: https://www2.arnes.si/~aziber4/blockmodeling/Dissertation-final-corrected.pdf.
  4. Žiberna, Aleš (2008). "Direct and indirect approaches to blockmodeling of valued networks in terms of regular equivalence". Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 32: 57–84.