// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did Maxwell's case go to court? It had a taxing issue.

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Maxwell
Court	Court of Appeal of England and Wales
Citation	[2010] EWCA Civ 1379
Keywords
Insolvency

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Maxwell [2010] EWCA Civ 1379 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning pre-pack insolvencies.

Facts

HMRC argued that at a creditors’ meeting to approve a prepack insolvency for the Mercury Tax Group Ltd it should have been given £8m worth of votes, rather than £1.5m admitted by the chairman, Edward Klempka. He was an insolvency practitioner appointed by Mercury’s directors, and was attempting to effect a sale of the business to the management. They argued there were impermissible deductions for payments to employee benefit trusts and substantial loans to directors.

The Judge held that only the liquidated debts had to be counted for the purpose of assessing the votes at the meeting, and it was within Klempka’s discretion to not count the HMRC debts.

Judgment

Lord Neuberger MR allowed the appeal. The judge’s role was to form her own view, not merely review the chairman’s decision under IR 1986 r 2.39, and had been wrong to make up his mind based on what Klempka had seen and the judge had not. The chairman’s power of quantification had to take account of events occurring since the date of administration and before the meeting. Once the HMRC had amended its notices and given sums even though they came after the administration date and even though they could be challenged, they should be counted.

See also

• UK insolvency law