Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a231e0ffec644652

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the Gradient Salience Model say? "I'm grading to meet you.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Gradient Salience model is a model of figurative language comprehension proposed by Rachel Giora in 2002[1] as an alternative to the standard pragmatic model.

It offers a possible explanation for the results obtained in various contemporary studies, in which figurative language is processed as fast as literal language.

Salient and non salient meanings

[edit]

The definition of saliency is included in Rachel Giora's (2002) article "Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal?".[1] Salient meanings are meanings which are stored in the mental lexicon. They are most prominent in language, as they are the most familiar, conventional, frequent and prototypical. Non salient meanings, on the other hand, are meanings which are relatively new to language. They are novel and infrequent.[2]

Assumptions

[edit]

The Gradient Salience model assumes that the processing of metaphorical expressions depends on the meaning's saliency.[2]

  • Salient meanings are processed faster than non salient ones, as they are more familiar. That is why conventional metaphors and literal expressions are processed faster than novel metaphors.
  • Non salient meanings are processed slower.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Giora, Rachel (2002). "Literal vs. Figurative language: Different or equal?". Journal of Pragmatics. 34 (4): 487–506. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00045-5.
  2. 1 2 Lai, Vicky Tzuyin; Curran, Tim; Menn, Lise (2009). "Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study" (PDF). Brain Research. 1284: 145–55. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-BE10-E. PMID 19505446. S2CID 15644733.