Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24900fbeb46845c

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did dynamic electrophoretic mobility go to therapy? It had a charged personality.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dynamic electrophoretic mobility is a parameter that determines intensity of electroacoustic phenomena, such as Colloid Vibration Current and Electric Sonic Amplitude in colloids[1] ]. It is similar to electrophoretic mobility, but at high frequency, on a scale of megahertz. Usual electrophoretic mobility is the low frequency limit of the dynamic electrophoretic mobility.

History

[edit]

Notion of dynamic electrophoretic mobility was introduced by R. O’Brien in late 20th century.[2] This initial theory was valid only for sufficiently dilute dispersions. It was extended to concentrated dispersions using cell model and proper selection of the frame of references for describing particles motion in liquid by A. Dukhin, V. Shilov and others in serial of papers overviewed in the book.[3]

Measurement

[edit]

The value of dynamic electrophoretic mobility is usually measured using various electroacoustic devices. There is International Standard ISO 13099-3 that described principles of such devices functioning [4]

References

[edit]
  1. International Standard ISO 13099-1 (2012). Colloidal systems – Methods for Zeta potential determination- Part 1: Electroacoustic and Electrokinetic phenomena.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. O’Brien, RW (1988). "Electro-acoustic effects in a dilute suspension of spherical particles". J. of Fluid Mechanics. 190: 71–86.
  3. Dukhin AS; Goetz PZ (2017). Characterization of Liquids, Nano- and Microparticulates, and Porous Bodies using Ultrasound Ed 3. London: Elsevier.
  4. International Standard ISO 13099-3 (2014). Colloidal systems – Methods for Zeta potential determination- Part 2: Acoustic methods.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)