Draft talk:Reader Expectation Approach
Add topic| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improving Reader Expectation Approach
[edit]Hello Team!
This page was deleted with tags for third-party and promotional tone. I did a deep edit and was hoping I could get feedback about the improvements or other specific issues in the article. If it looks good now, maybe one of you could remove those tags? Thank you for your work! Rewagoner (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
EDIT: Also, I have a conflict of interest in editing this article, as I work as an authorized representative for George David Gopen. I have disclosed this conflict on the Talk:George David Gopen article as well. I have attempted to write in an encyclopedic and neutral tone and welcome review and correction by uninvolved editors.
Added many secondary sources today!
[edit]Also worked hard at neutral language. Please let me know if this is acceptable for Wikipedia standards. Thanks for your work!
Rwagoner Rewagoner (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Added a criticism section and found an article to place there. Stark 1996.
[edit]There is a substantive body of work discussing Reader Expectation Approach in peer-reviewed literature and I've been adding to it if someone wants to check out my progress. I'd love your feedback!
Thank you for your work,
Rwagoner Rewagoner (talk) 17:48, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Draft-Class education pages
- NA-importance education pages
- WikiProject Education articles
- Draft-Class Writing pages
- NA-importance Writing pages
- WikiProject Writing articles
- Draft-Class Linguistics pages
- NA-importance Linguistics pages
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Draft-Class English Language pages
- NA-importance English Language pages
- WikiProject English Language articles
