Draft talk:Quality Group
Add topic| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
| This page was edited to contain a partial translation of The Quality Group from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Revised and resubmitted
[edit]Thanks for the review. I've toned down the promotional wording — dropped the marketing phrasing and the descriptive detail that came from the company's own pages, and rewrote the brand and product passages plainly.
On notability, the draft rests on independent coverage of the company itself in Handelsblatt, WirtschaftsWoche and MedWatch, plus reporting on its advertising disputes and a customs investigation; per WP:NONENG these count, and I've added some English-language trade coverage as well. The announcement-based and company-linked sources are only there to verify routine facts. Happy to lay out a source-by-source assessment if it helps. ~2026-37398-43 (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Source assessment
[edit]As offered above, here is how I see the sourcing against WP:SIRS. The notability case rests on three pieces, the rest is cited for verification and I don't claim otherwise.
| Source | Independent | Reliable | Depth | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Handelsblatt, Feb 17, 2025 | y | y | y | Full feature on the company: history, business model, revenue, ownership, risks |
| WirtschaftsWoche, Oct 7, 2025 | y | y | y | Analytical feature on the group's market position, own reporting |
| MedWatch, Sep 22, 2023 | y | y | y | Long investigative piece on the group, its brands and marketing. MedWatch is a journalistic outlet focused on health claims, no ties to the subject |
| LTO, Feb 29, 2024 | y | y | partial | Court ruling on the company's advertising, discussed in some depth |
| T-Online, Dec 15, 2023 | y | y | partial | Original reporting on the customs inspection |
| Just Food, Apr 3, 2025 | y | y | partial | RAW Nutrition transaction, with some independent context |
| Lebensmittel Zeitung, Jun 5, 2025 | y | y | partial | IPO preparations, trade press analysis |
The remaining citations (Business Insider, the two LZ trade items, Nutrition Insight, New Food Magazine, Watson, company website) are announcement-based or primary and only verify routine facts per WP:ORGTRIV. Verbraucherzentrale NRW and foodwatch are parties to the advertising disputes and are cited attributed, for their own actions only.
The first three each satisfy ORGIND, RS and ORGDEPTH on their own, which meets NCORP. They are in German, which is fine per WP:NONENG. If translated excerpts of any passage would help, ask and I'll post them here. ~2026-39507-56 (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)