Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27d0a6c3c1cd806

Jump to content

Draft talk:Inanimate Insanity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Wikiman2230 in topic Timewasting?

Should we add the II remaster to the series overview?

[edit]

Not sure if it would be counted as “season 5” or what it would even be counted as, but it’s basically a season of the show. RandomSillyGuy9 (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

If so, should we add the remastered episodes to the total episode count aswell? RandomSillyGuy9 (talk) 12:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
It isn't know as Season 5 or adding to the episode count, both officially and in the community (as the plot and events are mostly the same). The table could list it as "1R", as II 1R is its abbreviation. --Meester Tweester (talk) 03:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Will add! BFDIEditor (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The remaster is not officially canon to the actual show, and is such a.. well a remaster of the first season. Therefore it shouldn't be on the overview table. Wikiman (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I hope this gets accepted

[edit]
)

Myguytungtung (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Help me add citations

[edit]

I merged background and history from the old II wikipedia page, but it had no citations, so can someone help me add citations? BFDIEditor (talk) 03:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@BFDIEditor Update: Edit has been undone. Wikiman (Talk) 23:58, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Timewasting?

[edit]

I see that this has been submitted to AfC again, only two months after it was last declined, without any appreciable improvement to the content or sourcing. Why would we expect the outcome to be any different this time? What has changed? This seems like a waste of time.

If this is to stand a chance of success it needs to have support from Reliable Sources. Here are some search links that will help to find anything, if there is anything to find:

It's not looking good on a first glance but maybe others can find something under the dross of IMDB pages. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A second reject has now been in place. Wikiman (Talk) 23:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply