Draft talk:Bulma (front-end framework)

Draft rejection

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG. DoubleGrazing (talk)

@DoubleGrazing Thank you for reviewing my draft. I took your comment, and I added several independent secondary sources that provide substantive coverage of Bulma:

• Learning Bulma by Aravind Shenoy, published by Apress;
• A dedicated SitePoint article covering Bulma’s layout system, components, and modifier classes;
• Coverage in the Open Source Yearbook 2016 by Opensource.com;
• The existing HubSpot and LogRocket articles, which discuss Bulma in depth and compare it with other CSS frameworks.

I also added a short Reception and Coverage section to make this independent coverage more visible in the article. I kept the primary sources from Bulma and GitHub for specific technical details such as release dates, implementation details, theming, Sass structure, and licensing.

From my understanding, the draft is in line with similar articles about CSS frontend frameworks, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML_(framework) or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueprint_(CSS_framework) .

If you disagree that it can be published as-is, let me know how we can improve it further Cooking Time (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2026 (UTC)