Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a411c1717be85c4f

Jump to content

Draft talk:Agentic software engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Distinction from AI-assisted software development

[edit]

Thanks for reviewing, M kuhner. The distinction is scope and sourcing.

AI-assisted software development covers the broad practice of using AI across the development workflow, sourced largely to industry and general press. Whereas my draft covers a narrower subject: an emerging academic discipline framing agent-based development as an engineering field, with its own foundational model ("SE for Humans and SE for Agents"), an ACM/IEEE workshop at ICSE 2026, and a systematic review in IEEE Access. The sourcing is almost entirely peer-reviewed and doesn't overlap with the parent article.

This also mirrors the existing structure, where vibe coding has a standalone article while being summarized within the parent (a specific concept coexisting with the broader topic). I've added a wikilink to situate this draft the same way.

That said, I'll defer to your judgment: does the distinct scholarly scope warrant a standalone article, or would it be better merged as a potential new section within AI-assisted software development? I'm happy either way.

Drewski720 (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

PS another way to think of this:
1. AI-assisted software development treats AI as a tool within an unchanged process.
2. Agentic engineering argues the entire software development lifecycle must restructure around the tool. Drewski720 (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
If this distinction can be shown in reliable sources, it can certainly justify a stand-alone article. It can't be an ad-hoc distinction for article purposes, though: ideal would be to find someone making the distinction you just made, in a reliable source. Then you could lead off with a section that clearly distinguishes this concept from AI-assisted development.
(I'll note I have not reviewed this article: I was on the fence, so left a comment instead. Someone else will review it.) M kuhner (talk) 20:48, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply