Draft:Shapermint
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 5 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,571 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 14 September 2026 by ArthurTheGardener (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by M kuhner 56 days ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. | |
Submission declined on 15 July 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information.This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by ChrysGalley 2 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. | |
Comment: Some links seem to be broken: this may be because the LLM-generated material hasn't been thoroughly checked. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: The first reference I spotchecked was a broken link. I don't think you've completely removed the LLM text, given this. Promotional tone has been reduced--good work on that--but there is still no real case for notability being made. You may find WP:CORPTRIV useful as a rundown of things that don't count for notability as they are considered routine business. M kuhner (talk) 21:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: AI generated advertisement - we can't accept such submissions. ChrysGalley (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Shapermint is an American direct-to-consumer apparel company specializing in shapewear and intimate apparel. The company was founded in 2018, is operated by the e-commerce group Trafilea, and functions primarily through its online platform.[1]
History
[edit]The company was founded in 2018, selling exclusively online. During its first three years of operation, Shapermint sold approximately $250 million worth of products, capturing a 20% share of the United States women's shapewear market.[2][3]
The brand reported $150 million in revenue in 2020, which grew to $180 million in 2021.[1] In early 2022, its parent company, Trafilea, entered into discussions with private equity and venture capital firms to raise an institutional funding round of up to $100 million, with corporate valuation projections estimated between $900 million and $1.8 billion.[1]
Over time Shapermint expanded its distribution channels. In 2022, the brand began selling its products in physical retail stores through partnerships with traditional retailers such as Nordstrom and Belk.[4] In December of that same year, Trafilea acquired The BodCon, an annual virtual conference and podcast, establishing a media and events division to complement its apparel brands.[5]
By 2024 the company had surpassed 10 million customers, projecting annual revenues exceeding $300 million.[6]
Business model
[edit]Shapermint operates primarily as a direct-to-consumer retailer. Its early marketing model relied heavily on paid social advertising and user-generated content, with the majority of its budget allocated to platforms like Facebook and Instagram.[7] Since 2024, the company has integrated an internal artificial intelligence advertising system called Altair to streamline ad testing and support content production.[6]
Within the apparel industry, retail analysts have noted Shapermint operational model for treating extended sizing as a core component of its business strategy rather than a secondary category.[8] By building size accessibility into the initial product architecture and utilizing community-based fit validation, the brand reduced e-commerce purchasing friction and operational costs.[8]
Products
[edit]Shapermint product line includes bras, leggings, underwear, and shapewear garments. The company's core collections are manufactured with a focus on extended sizing, typically offering a range from small up to 4XL.[8]
References
[edit]- 1 2 3 Primack, Dan (March 4, 2022). "Scoop: Shapermint parent Trafilea in talks to raise more than $50M". Axios. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- ↑ Sternlicht, Alexandra (August 23, 2021). "How A 28-Year-Old Used Data To Sell $250 Million Of Shapewear Over Three Years". Forbes. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- ↑ "How Shapermint quietly took a fifth of the US shapewear market". Glossy. February 16, 2021. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- ↑ Edelson, Sharon (August 31, 2022). "D2C Brand Shapermint Rolls Out To Brick And Mortar With Belk And Nordstrom". Forbes. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- ↑ "Spanx Challenger Invests in Body Confidence". Sourcing Journal. December 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- 1 2 "How Shapermint's proprietary AI ad tool is fueling profits". Marketing Dive. July 31, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- ↑ Monllos, Kristina (January 31, 2020). "DTC company Shapermint is spending 80% of its marketing budget on Facebook and Instagram". Digiday. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- 1 2 3 "Inclusive sizing as a growth strategy: What consumer brands can learn from the new shapewear market". LA Business First. April 17, 2026. Retrieved August 27, 2026.
- Draft articles about Internet culture
- Draft articles about software
- Draft articles about business and economics
- Draft articles about technology
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/17 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/15 September 2026
- AfC submissions by date/27 August 2026
- AfC submissions by date/22 July 2026
- AfC submissions by date/15 July 2026
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.