Draft:Bonusly
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,557 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Sulfurboy 5 days ago.
| |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Balabush 7 days ago.
| |
Comment: WP:ORGTRIV, also, real hard to believe that none of these sources are available online. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: This submission is being declined because the sourcing does not meet WP:NCORP, which sets a stricter bar than general notability for companies. Every citation here falls into a category NCORP explicitly excludes: funding round announcements (BizWest and TechCrunch on the seed, Series A, and Series B rounds), a regional "fastest growing companies" list, routine business reporting on a layoff, a passing mention inside a SHRM article about a different topic, and a PR Newswire item, which is a press release rather than independent journalism.None of these sources contain original, independent analysis of the company. NCORP requires at least two sources that go beyond restating what the company itself said. Please look for in-depth coverage from established business or general press that analyzes the company rather than reporting its own announcements. Balabush (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Bonusly is an American software company that provides an employee recognition and rewards platform. The company, whose legal name is Smartly, Inc., is based in Boulder, Colorado, and offers a peer-to-peer recognition system in which employees award points to colleagues that can be redeemed for gift cards, merchandise, or charitable donations.[1]
History
[edit]Bonusly, originally known as Bonus.ly, launched in 2013, introducing a model in which coworkers — rather than only managers — could award each other bonuses directly.[2] By 2019, the company reported strong growth in the United Kingdom, citing a 75 percent increase in UK customers over the preceding year and more than 250 UK-based companies using the platform to reward over 10,000 employees.[3]
Platform
[edit]Bonusly offers a peer-to-peer recognition system in which employees award points to colleagues that can be redeemed for gift cards, merchandise, or charitable donations.[1] The platform allows employees to personalize recognition with customized text and animated GIFs.[1] Its use has been associated with increased recognition across teams and departments and with giving managers visibility into contributions they might not otherwise observe; some companies have also reported a positive return relative to the platform's cost.[4][5][6]
Reception
[edit]Coverage of the broader trend toward peer-administered workplace bonuses, in which Bonusly has been cited as a leading example, has noted mixed reactions. Some users have described the model as a simple, tangible way to give timely recognition, while others have likened the dynamic to a popularity contest and expressed discomfort with feeling pressure to seek visible approval from colleagues. A workplace psychologist has cautioned that without an existing culture built on strong values, such schemes risk becoming exclusionary.[3]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c Chen, Te-Ping (March 29, 2022). "Have You Praised a Colleague Today? Go On, Say Something Nice". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2026-07-23. Retrieved 2026-07-23.
- ^ Naziri, Jessica (May 12, 2013). "Bonus.ly looks to motivate workers with peer-to-peer bonuses". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2026-07-23.
- ^ a b Hannah, Felicity (May 2, 2019). "Peer-to-peer rewards: 'Why I tip my colleagues at work'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2019-06-15. Retrieved 2026-07-24.
- ^ "Online Service Turns Employee Appreciation Into Cash". CBS News Boston. January 10, 2018. Retrieved 2026-07-23.
- ^ Ackerman, Mark (March 7, 2018). "New Tool Helps Colleagues Give Credit For Work Well Done". CBS News Colorado. Retrieved 2026-07-23.
- ^ Cousineau, Michael (October 26, 2019). "What's Working: Empowering employees to grant smiles". New Hampshire Union Leader. Archived from the original on 2026-07-24. Retrieved 2026-07-24.
- Draft articles about software
- Draft articles about business and economics
- Draft articles about STEM
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/4 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/24 July 2026
- AfC submissions by date/23 July 2026
- AfC submissions by date/22 July 2026
- AfC submissions by date/21 July 2026
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.