Draft:Bhattacharjee Rohan
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Bhattacharjee Rohan (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Bhattacharjee Rohan
Bhattacharjee Rohan is an Indian Computer Science and Technology (CST) student, engineering enthusiast, and AI developer from Murshidabad, West Bengal, India. He is passionate about software development, artificial intelligence, and modern technology.
Rohan is the creator and founder of Zimi AI, an intelligent AI assistant available through www.zimi.pro, designed to provide smart conversations and digital assistance to users. His interests include artificial intelligence, web development, app development, and creating innovative technology solutions.
As an engineering student, Rohan continuously explores new technologies and works on projects related to AI, automation, and software engineering. He aims to build advanced digital platforms that make technology more accessible and useful for everyone.
Fields of Interest: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Software Development, Web Technologies, Mobile Applications, Automation, and Computer Engineering.
Residence: Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.
Known For: Creator of Zimi AI and contributions to AI-based software projects and technology development.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.