Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40dfac3ae025645

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the doorman fallacy say? I'm always falling for it.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The doorman fallacy is a category error in which a complex human role is reduced to a function, leading to the assumption that it can be replaced with a cost-effective automated substitute without loss of value, with decision-makers failing to understand the indirect, intangible, non-visible value they provide.[1]

The concept is closely related to ideas in behavioral economics and signaling theory, particularly the distinction between observable tasks and latent value creation.[2]

Origin

[edit]

The term "doorman fallacy" was coined and popularized by Rory Sutherland in his 2019 book Alchemy. The Surprising Power of Ideas That Don’t Make Sense.[3]

The term "doorman" refers to the role of a hotel doorman, which is mistakenly assumed to be solely for opening doors. The hotel replaces the doorman with an automated door system as a cost-saving measure. However, they fail to realize the indirect functions like:

  • Guest recognition and assistance
  • Providing security and surveillance
  • Status signaling and brand perception

Sutherland argues that such roles often create less visible value that exceeds their direct cost, meaning removal can reduce long-term profitability despite lowering operational expenditure.[3][4]

Use in AI

[edit]

Recent discussions have extended the concept of the doorman fallacy to generative AI's replacement of white-collar and customer service roles.[5]

In 2025, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia laid 45 customer service staff off, replacing them with an automated AI voice bot. The bank reversed its decision amid pressure from a workers' union, admitting it "did not adequately consider all relevant business considerations and this error meant the roles were not redundant".[6][5] Robert Wachter, head of medicine at the University of California, described the idea that AI could replace doctors an example of the fallacy.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Lipnickas, Gediminas (3 November 2025). "The 'doorman fallacy': why careless adoption of AI backfires so easily". The Conversation. Retrieved 20 June 2026.
  2. ↑ "The Doorman. The Magic Starts Here. Charles Leon". Charles Leon. 2019-07-21. Retrieved 2026-07-04.
  3. 1 2 Sutherland, Rory (2019). Alchemy : the surprising power of ideas that don't make sense. London. ISBN 978-0-7535-5137-0. OCLC 1091689287.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. ↑ "Rory Sutherland's doorman fallacy". MFP Wealth Management. Retrieved 2026-06-24.
  5. 1 2 Lipnickas, Gediminas (3 November 2025). "The 'doorman fallacy': why careless adoption of AI backfires so easily". The Conversation. Retrieved 2026-09-25.
  6. ↑ Subin, Samantha (2025-10-22). "AI is already taking white-collar jobs. Economists warn there's 'much more in the tank'". CNBC. Retrieved 2026-06-24.
  7. ↑ Landymore, Frank (4 September 2026). "American Medical Association Fires Back Against Paper Finding AI Is Now Outperforming Doctors". Retrieved 2026-09-25.