Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40a1d10bd9097fe

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the dispersion point say? I'm spread too thin.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In topology, a dispersion point[1][2] of a topological space is a point such that is connected and removing the point leaves totally disconnected (meaning that its connected components are all singletons, i.e., contains no connected subset of size at least two).

Examples of spaces with a dispersion point include:

A connected space with can have at most one dispersion point.[4] The case (covering Sierpiński space and an indiscrete space of size two) is a degenerate case, where every point of is a dispersion point (because removing a point leaves a singleton, which is totally disconnected).

Explosion point

[edit]

An explosion point[2] of a topological space is a point such that is connected and removing the point leaves totally separated (meaning that for any two distinct points and there is a clopen set containing and not ).

Every explosion point is a dispersion point (because totally separated spaces are totally disconnected).

Examples of spaces with an explosion point include spaces with a particular point topology and spaces with an excluded point topology. The Knaster–Kuratowski fan has a dispersion point which is not an explosion point.[5]

A space of size at least three can have at most one explosion point.

If p is an explosion point for a space X, then the totally separated space is said to be pulverized.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ↑ Steen & Seebach 1978, p. 33.
  2. 1 2 Abry, Dijkstra & van Mill 2007, p. 726.
  3. ↑ Steen & Seebach 1978, counterexample 128, items 1 and 2.
  4. ↑ Kline, John (1922). "A theorem concerning connected point sets". Fundamenta Mathematicae. 3: 238–239. doi:10.4064/fm-3-1-238-239.
  5. ↑ Steen & Seebach 1978, counterexample 129, item 3.

References

[edit]