Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25482c5fc502877

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did Crough Seamount go to therapy? It had a rough sea-son.

Map
Crough Seamount

Crough Seamount (named after the geologist Thomas Crough[1]) is a seamount in the Pacific Ocean, within the exclusive economic zone of Pitcairn.[2] It rises to a depth of 650 metres (2,130 ft) and is paired with a taller but overall smaller seamount to the east. This seamount has a flat top and probably formed an island in the past. It is about 7-8 million years old, although a large earthquake recorded at its position in 1955 may indicate a recent eruption.

The seamount appears to be part of a long geological lineament with the neighbouring Henderson and Ducie islands, as well as the southern Tuamotus and Line Islands. Such a lineament may have been generated by a hotspot; the nearby Easter hotspot is a candidate hotspot.

Geology and geomorphology

[edit]

Regional

[edit]

The region lies between and around the islands of Pitcairn and Easter Island.[3] There, the East Pacific Rise is interrupted by a trapezoid microplate known as the Easter Microplate[4] about 400 kilometres (250 mi) wide. Seafloor spreading occurs at a rate of about 16 centimetres per year (6.3 in/year).[3]

There is a topographic swell that connects the two islands and continues eastward towards Sala y Gomez. The origin of this swell and the various volcanoes and seamounts associated with it has been variously explained as either being due to a mantle plume which forms volcanoes that are then carried away through plate motion or by a "hot line" where a number of simultaneously active volcanic centres develop.[3] This geological lineament may extend all the way to Tonga.[5]

Crough seamount was probably formed by the Easter hotspot that also generated Easter Island[6] albeit with the participation of a nearby fracture zone[7] that modified the trend of the hotspot path.[8] In this case the Easter Island-Sala y Gomez ridge and the Crough Seamount would be conjugate volcanic ridges paired across the East Pacific Rise.[9] although it is possible that two separate hotspots were active on the eastern and western side of the East Pacific Rise.[10][11] Another theory postulates that Crough was formed by its own hotspot, the Crough hotspot.[12]

Together with Ducie and Henderson Crough forms a 1,300 kilometres (810 mi) long westward trending lineament[13] with each volcano becoming older the farther west it lies,[14] and which may be a prolongation of the southern Tuamotus[15] which were generated by the same hotspot.[9] Even farther west the hotspot track may include Oeno, Minerve Reef, Marutea, Acton, Rangiroa, the Line Islands and the Mid-Pacific Mountains, although a continuation through the Line Islands is problematic if it is assumed that the Easter hotspot generated this track.[12][16] A different theory has Crough seamount as its own hotspot, that formed the seamounts and islands together with another hotspot ("Larson"),[17] and lesser contributions of the Society and Marquesas hotspot.[18] East of Crough, a series of even younger volcanic ridges continues until the East Pacific Rise[19] where the hotspot may be located.[12] The Crough hotspot may be a conjugate of the Easter hotspot,[20] and sourced from the middle mantle.[17]

Local

[edit]

Crough is an east–west trending seamount[4] which rises over 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) from the seafloor to a depth of less than 722 metres (2,369 ft)[21] at 650 metres (2,130 ft).[22] It has a flat top and the presence of coral sands indicates that Crough once emerged above sea level before subsiding to its present depth,[21] having formerly hosted corals[23] and pteropods. Wave erosion that took place when Crough emerged above sea level truncated the seamount, turning it into a flat guyot.[24] Pillow lavas crop out between 1,400–950 metres (4,590–3,120 ft).[25] Crough Seamount has a volume of 660 cubic kilometres (160 cu mi), comparable to that of other submarine volcanoes such as Macdonald seamount, Mehetia and Moua Pihaa.[22]

A second seamount lies nearby and partly overlaps with Crough,[26] it is named Thomas Seamount[27] in honour of a geophysicist.[28] This seamount is even shallower than Crough as it reaches a depth of 600 metres (2,000 ft) but has a smaller volume of 600 cubic kilometres (140 cu mi).[22] Both seamounts are situated at the ends of volcanic ridges.[29]

Composition

[edit]

Dredging has yielded both vesicular and porphyritic basalt. Phenocrysts identified include clinopyroxene, olivine and plagioclase. Carbonates and hyaloclastites have also been found, and some samples were covered with manganese crusts[30] and palagonite.[31] Hydrothermal iron crusts have also been found.[25] There are some similarities between the Crough magmas and Easter Island magmas.[32]

Eruption history

[edit]

Argon-argon dating has yielded ages of 8.4 to 7.6 million years ago for samples dredged from Crough,[33] while other geological indicators suggest an age of between 7 and 10 million years ago.[34] Other estimates of its age are 4[14]-3 million years.[35]

In 1955, a strong earthquake was recorded on the northern flank of Crough Seamount;[36] the characteristics of the earthquake resemble these of volcanic processes and it is thus possible that Crough Seamount is still active. Such activity may constitute a post-shield stage of volcanism.[35] The earthquake has also been interpreted as a normal fault earthquake[1] which sometimes occur in young oceanic crust, but the 1955 Crough event was considerably stronger than other earthquakes of this type.[37]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Okal & Cazenave 1985, p. 104.
  2. Irving, Robert.; Dawson, Terence P. (2012). The marine environment of the Pitcairn Islands. Dundee: The Pew Environment Group. ISBN 9781845861612. OCLC 896746178.
  3. 1 2 3 Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 376.
  4. 1 2 Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 377.
  5. Spencer 1989, p. 6.
  6. Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 389.
  7. Spencer 1989, p. 5.
  8. Searle, Francheteau & Cornaglia 1995, p. 397.
  9. 1 2 Searle, Francheteau & Cornaglia 1995, p. 417.
  10. O'Connor, Stoffers & McWilliams 1995, p. 208.
  11. Morgan & Morgan 2007, p. 51.
  12. 1 2 3 Morgan & Morgan 2007, p. 71.
  13. Binard et al. 1996, p. 24.
  14. 1 2 Bramwell, David; Caujapé-Castells, Juli (2011-07-21). The Biology of Island Floras. Cambridge University Press. p. 241. ISBN 9781139497800.
  15. Vacher & Quinn 1997, p. 410.
  16. Fletcher, Michael; Wyman, Derek A.; Zahirovic, Sabin (1 July 2020). "Mantle plumes, triple junctions and transforms: A reinterpretation of Pacific Cretaceous – Tertiary LIPs and the Laramide connection". Geoscience Frontiers. 11 (4): 1141. Bibcode:2020GeoFr..11.1133F. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2019.09.003.
  17. 1 2 Pockalny et al. 2021, p. 1361.
  18. Pockalny et al. 2021, p. 1360.
  19. Binard et al. 1996, p. 34.
  20. Fletcher, Michael; Wyman, Derek A.; Zahirovic, Sabin (26 September 2019). "Mantle plumes, triple junctions and transforms: A reinterpretation of Pacific Cretaceous – Tertiary LIPs and the Laramide connection". Geoscience Frontiers. 11 (4): 9. Bibcode:2020GeoFr..11.1133F. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2019.09.003. ISSN 1674-9871.
  21. 1 2 Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 380.
  22. 1 2 3 Binard et al. 1996, p. 27.
  23. Vacher & Quinn 1997, p. 407.
  24. Binard et al. 1996, p. 31.
  25. 1 2 Stoffers, P.; Glasby, G. P.; Stuben, D.; Renner, R. M.; Pierre, T. G.; Webb, J.; Cardile, C. M. (1993). "Comparative mineralogy and geochemistry of hydrothermal iron-rich crusts from the Pitcairn, Teahitia-mehetia, and Macdonald hot spot areas of the S. W. Pacific". Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. 11 (1): 47. Bibcode:1993MGG....11...45S. doi:10.1080/10641199309379905.
  26. Spencer 1989, p. 3.
  27. Binard et al. 1996, p. 26.
  28. Searle, Francheteau & Cornaglia 1995, p. 400.
  29. O’Connor, Regelous & Haase 2024, p. 3.
  30. Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 379.
  31. Hekinian et al. 1995, p. 382.
  32. O’Connor, Regelous & Haase 2024, p. 5.
  33. O'Connor, Stoffers & McWilliams 1995, pp. 206–207.
  34. Binard et al. 1996, p. 25.
  35. 1 2 Talandier & Okal 1987, p. 946.
  36. Talandier & Okal 1987, p. 945.
  37. Okal & Cazenave 1985, p. 108.

Sources

[edit]

25°00′S 121°12′W / 25°S 121.2°W / -25; -121.2[1]

  1. 1 2 Spencer 1989, p. 3.