Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238a8362edbb7b5

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy was construction morphology a good builder? It had a solid foundation.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Construction morphology (CM) is a morphological theory aimed at a better understanding of the grammar of words, as well as the relation between syntax, morphology, and the lexicon. Susanne Z. Riehemann developed the theoretical foundations in her masters thesis in 1993, which was later published as Riehemann (1998). She named her approach type-based morphology. It was fully formalized in the framework of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar but basically used ideas and concepts that later became popular within Construction Grammar. Geert Booij published work using and extending Riehemann's ideas starting in the 2000s under the name of Construction Morphology.[1]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Geert Booij, Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
  • Riehemann, Susanne. 1993. Word formation in lexical type hierarchies: A case study of bar-adjectives in German. Also published as SfS-Report-02-93, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Tübingen. Universität Tübingen MA thesis.
  • Riehemann, Susanne Z. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(1). 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009746617055.
[edit]