Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25fbd94eea2cb43

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the Constitution Review Group say to the law? "We're amending to be friends.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Constitution Review Group (CRG) was a group established by the Irish government in 1995 to review the Constitution of Ireland and recommend amendments. The group was chaired by T. K. Whitaker and had fifteen members selected from different backgrounds, though lawyers predominated.[1]

Establishment

[edit]

A Government of Renewal, the programme of the 24th government of Ireland established in December 1994, specified that a constitution review group would be established and its report would be the basis, not for direct government action, but rather for a subsequent cross-party committee.[2][3] The government order establishing the CRG was made on 27 April 1995[4] and the group was launched on 11 May 1995. The terms of reference were:[4]

to review the Constitution, and in the light of this review, to establish those areas where constitutional change may be desirable or necessary, with a view to assisting the all-Party Committee on the Constitution, to be established by the Oireachtas, in its work, in their review, the Croup should take into account that certain constitutional matters i.e. Articles 2 and 3, Divorce, the Right to Bail, Cabinet Confidentiality and Votes for Emigrants are the subject of separate consideration.

The excluded matters were already under consideration by the government:[5]

Members

[edit]

The CRG had 15 members, including a chairman and three convenors. Their names and listed qualifications were as follows:[4][6]

Whereas Gleeson and Hamilton as existing public servants received no remuneration, the others received IR£2,500, with £3,250 for convenors and £3,750 for the chairman. Hogan waived his fee and Lynch's was donated to her UCD department.[6]

Report

[edit]

The CRG provided provisional reports on several issues to the Taoiseach on 20 December 1995.[5] The full report was submitted on 31 May 1996[7] published on 3 July 1996, and laid before the houses of the Oireachtas the following day.[1] It ran to 700 pages.[1] The promised All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution was established (as an "informal" committee rather than a formal Oireachtas committee[8]) on 3 July 1996 by the government with the agreement of opposition party leaders, taking the CRG report in its terms of reference, and availing of numerous documents produced by and for the CRG.[1][9] The informal committee was reconstituted after the 1997 and 2002 elections with similar terms of reference and made 10 reports, each of which drew on the 1996 CRG report.[10]

Appraisal

[edit]

The Oireachtas Committee described the CRG report as the most thorough analysis of the Constitution of Ireland ever made.[11] Leo Flynn in European Public Law called it an "excellent study" and "valuable resource".[12] Andrew Butler and Rory O'Connell in the Irish Jurist criticised the CRG for "failure to consider its reason for being, complacency, a lopsidedly legalistic perspective, and a lack of imagination".[13]

Sources

[edit]
  • Constitution Review Group (May 1996). Report of the Constitution Review Group (PDF). Government Publications. Vol. Pn 2632. Dublin: Stationery Office. ISBN 0-7076-2440-1.

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution (April 1997). "Foreword". First Progress Report (PDF). Government Publications. Vol. Pn 3795. Dublin: Stationery Office. p. vii. ISBN 0707638585 via Citizens' Assembly.
  2. "A government of renewal: summary of the agreed programme for government between Fine Gael, the Labour Party, Democratic Left" (PDF). December 1994. pp. 9–10. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  3. "Vol. 461 No. 2: Questions Oral Answers. - Report of Constitutional Review Group". Dáil Éireann debate. 7 February 1996. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  4. 1 2 3 Constitution Review Group (1996) p. i
  5. 1 2 "Vol. 460 No. 4: Questions. Oral Answers. - Constitution Review Group". Dáil Éireann debate. 24 January 1996. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  6. 1 2 "Written Answers. - Ministerial Appointments". Vol. 475 No. 8: Dáil Éireann debate. 5 March 1997. 14.The Constitution Review Group (13 Members). Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  7. "Vol. 466 No. 7: Questions. Oral Answers. - Constitution Review Group Report". Dáil Éireann debate. 12 June 1996. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  8. "Home page". All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution. 2005. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. the committee is an informal Oireachtas committee
  9. "Vol. 469 No. 1: Written Answers. - Committee on the Constitution". Dáil Éireann debate. 25 September 1996. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  10. "Our Constitution". Citizens' Assembly. Retrieved 16 April 2026.
  11. "The Constitution Review Group (CRG)", The All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, archived from the original on 21 July 2011, retrieved 6 June 2010
  12. Flynn, Leo (1 June 1997). "Book Review: Constitution Review Group, Report of the Constitution Review Group (Stationery Office, Dublin, 1996)". European Public Law. 3 (2): 283. doi:10.54648/euro1997023.
  13. Butler, Andrew; O'Connell, Rory (1998). "A Critical Analysis of Ireland's Constitutional Review Group Report". Irish Jurist. 33: 243. ISSN 0021-1273. JSTOR 44027304.