Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24a826b29a7c465

Jump to content

Competing harms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Competing harms, also known as necessity defense, self-defense defense, or lesser harm, is a legal doctrine in certain U.S. states, particularly in New England. For example, the Maine Criminal Code holds that "Conduct that the person believes to be necessary to avoid imminent physical harm to that person or another is justifiable if the desirability and urgency of avoiding such harm outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the statute defining the crime charged. The desirability and urgency of such conduct may not rest upon considerations pertaining to the morality and advisability of such statute."[1] New Hampshire has a similar statute.[2] The competing harms defense was unsuccessfully raised in the trial of Carter Wentworth for his role in the Clamshell Alliance's 1977 occupation of the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. §103. Competing harms, Maine Revised Statutes
  2. 627:3 Competing Harms
  3. Robert Surbrug. Beyond Vietnam: The Politics of Protest in Massachusetts, 1974-1990.