Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245df325f6f52f1

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Commission v Council say to the judge? "We're appealing to a higher council.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Commission v Council
CourtEuropean Court of Justice
Citations(1971) Case 22/70, [1971] ECR 263
Keywords
Legislation, legality

Commission v Council (1971) Case 22/70 is an EU law case, concerning the legality of legislative acts in the European Union.

Facts

[edit]

Relating to the European Road Transport Agreement, a Council ‘resolution’ settled the negotiating procedure for an upcoming conference. The Commission challenged the resolution as being against EU law, and the only way to do this was to ask for annulment of the ‘resolution’. Could it be a subject of such proceedings? TEEC article 190 (now TFEU article 288) at the time stated that regulations, directive and decisions were only valid if they stated the reasons on which they were based.

Judgment

[edit]

The Court of Justice held the list in (what is now) TFEU article 288 is not exhaustive, and Acts can be binding without falling into those categories. The resolution was a valid act outside the list.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Butler, Graham; Wessel, Ramses A (2022). EU External Relations Law: The Cases in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing/Bloomsbury. ISBN 9781509939695.