Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236ce0458aea151

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did circular procurement say? "I'm going around in circles.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Circular procurement is the procurement of products and services that follow circular economy principles, prioritizing reuse, durability, and recycling within supply chains to extend product life cycles and minimize waste. It may involve acquiring goods and services designed for longevity or reuse, incorporating shared-use models, refurbishing existing assets, and purchasing products containing recycled materials.[1]

According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the practice emphasizes the design, production, use, reuse, and recycling of products to maximize their value during use and at the end of their life cycle.[2] Circular procurement is often regarded as an aspect of sustainable procurement[3] and can be incorporated into supply chain management[4] or public procurement frameworks.

Policy

[edit]

Circular public procurement contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined by the United Nations in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.[5] In particular SDG 12, Responsible Consumption and Production, includes a target to promote sustainable public procurement practices in line with national policies and priorities.[3]

The European Union Circular Economy Action Plan is a policy framework designed to address the environmental and resource impacts across the life cycle of products.[1]

Circular procurement can be implemented at several levels:[6]

  • Product level: Focuses on the production and end-use of specific products, such as the use of recycled and recyclable materials, resource efficiency, and products that can be disassembled after use.
  • Supplier level: Relates to how suppliers integrate circular practices into their systems and processes to ensure that their products and services meet circular procurement criteria. Examples include internal and external product reuse, product repairability, and supplier take-back systems.
  • System level: Involves contractual approaches that support circular practices, such as supplier take-back agreements, product-as-a-service models, and cooperation between organizations for sharing/reuse.

Objectives and outcomes

[edit]

Circular procurement may contribute to the objectives of a circular economy within supply chain management.[2][7] A 2014 report by the World Economic Forum, and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation projected that broader adoption of circular economy practices could contribute approximately $1 trillion in material savings annually by 2025 and create roughly 100,000 jobs across multiple sectors within five years.[8] A study of 255 Chinese manufacturers found that circular procurement was associated with reduced costs and improved financial performance.[4]

Criticism

[edit]

In the construction industry, barriers to the adoption of circular procurement can be categorized as hard or soft. Hard barriers include the absence of circular design practices, reverse logistics systems, standardized frameworks, and business models. Soft barriers, on the other hand, encompass limited stakeholder engagement, lack of trust, and resistance to organizational change.[1]

Identified risks include vulnerability to greenwashing and insufficient assessment of environmental and social impacts.[9][10][11]

Practical barriers include high infrastructure costs, the absence of standardized definitions or enforcement mechanisms, and limited scalability beyond pilot projects. Additional challenges include overcoming the prevailing perception that circular practices could hinder a region's economic or material development.[12]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 Sajid, Zeerak Waryam; Aftab, Usman; Ullah, Fahim (2024-12-01). "Barriers to adopting circular procurement in the construction industry: The way forward". Sustainable Futures. 8 100244. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100244. ISSN 2666-1888.
  2. 1 2 Xu, Linqi; Jia, Fu; Yan, Fangxu; Chen, Lujie (2022-09-10). "Circular procurement: A systematic literature review". Journal of Cleaner Production. 365 132845. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132845. ISSN 0959-6526.
  3. 1 2 Public procurement for a circular economy: Good practice and guidance. EU Commission. 2017. Content is copied from this source, which is © European Union, 1995-2018. Reuse is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged.
  4. 1 2 Farooque, Muhammad; Zhang, Abraham; Choi, Tsan-Ming; Hartley, Janet L.; Liu, Yanping (2024-10-01). "Antecedents and performance outcomes of circular procurement: An empirical study in China". Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 30 (4) 100882. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2023.100882. ISSN 1478-4092.
  5. "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 2025-05-29.
  6. Jones, Mervyn; Sohn, Iben Kinch; Bendsen, Anne-Mette Lysemose (2017). Circular Procurement Best Practice Report (PDF). ICLEI Europe. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 19, 2022.
  7. Qazi, Asad Ali; Appolloni, Andrea (2022-09-01). "A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management". Sustainable Production and Consumption. 33: 343–359. Bibcode:2022SusPC..33..343Q. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.013. ISSN 2352-5509.
  8. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2014). "Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains" (PDF). World Economic Forum.
  9. Tátrai, Tünde; Diófási-Kovács, Orsolya (2021-09-01). "European Green Deal – the way to Circular Public Procurement". ERA Forum. 22 (3): 523–539. doi:10.1007/s12027-021-00678-2. ISSN 1863-9038.
  10. Khan, Owais; Hinterhuber, Andreas (2025-04-03). "An experimental study on the susceptibility of purchasing managers to greenwashing". Scientific Reports. 15 (1): 11426. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94482-4. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 11968802.
  11. Granickas, Karolis (2020-07-14). "How to tell green procurement from greenwashing". Open Contracting Partnership. Retrieved 2025-11-28.
  12. "Against wasted politics: A critique of the circular economy | Ephemeral Journal". ephemerajournal.org. Archived from the original on 2025-09-09. Retrieved 2025-01-25.

Further reading

[edit]