Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a249b8a00ca8a9c0

Jump to content

Category talk:Contents

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Utopes in topic "Cat:" listed at Redirects for discussion

Categorized or Un-categorized

[edit]

Why is this page listed on the Uncategorized Categories page? Doesn't make sense. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 17:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The fact that the category doesn't have any parent categories might have something to do with it. - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Can we put it into some hidden category?Carn (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Category:Intentionally uncategorized categories? :p —Ruud 04:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

26 July 2010, the hiddencat Category:Parent categories was removed and this cat again appeared in uncategorized categories auto-generated list. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 09:09, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't this can be solved unless someone rewrites the software to make an exception for this page. I believe this is a corollary example of Russell's paradox, which only a bibliography student or philosopher would worry about. (ie most of us)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Overview headings

[edit]

Is there some reason the top-level headings of the overview can't be turned into categories? Codrdan (talk) 08:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

That would turn it into a list. Since it is a category the focus should be on sub categories. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Create a BOT to alphabetize and organize categories automatically

[edit]

As someone who has been doing this manually for years, I hereby dutifully beg of anyone who is technically proficient and knows how to create and run a bot that will:

  1. Automatically sort all Categories on each article and category page alphabetically;
  2. Create a uniform system for where to place categories on each article and category page that commence with numbers, such as years of birth/death, centuries, and any category that starts with a number/numeral.

Please see the centralized discussion at Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 61#Create a BOT to alphabetize and organize categories automatically. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 08:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion re-opened at VPP

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 114#Create a BOT to alphabetize and organize categories automatically. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tech help required to improve categories

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#CatVisor and User:Paradoctor/CatVisor#Planned features if you are willing and able to assist this innovative WP project move along it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This has become part of a circular reference

[edit]

Since this category was categorized as a "container category" it has become part of a circular reference of categories. This does not seem like a good idea. As stated in Wikipedia:Categorization#Category_tree_organization, Category:Contents is the top category and if you try to categorize it, you run into circular reference problems. So is there any opposition to removing the container category item? --Rsteen (talk) 10:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Rsteen: Agreed. I've removed the category. Optimist on the run (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

"CAT:" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect CAT: has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § CAT: until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 14:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Cat:" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Cat: has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Cat: until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 14:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply