Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46d01af0ad74e12

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeIs C. Scott Jacobs a baker? He kneads the dough.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
C. Scott Jacobs
Born
Curtis Scott Jacobs
EducationUniversity of Illinois
OccupationsArgumentation, communication, and rhetorical scholar

Curtis Scott Jacobs, (Scott Jacobs), is an American argumentation, communication, and rhetorical scholar.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a PhD. He taught for many years at the University of Arizona. He is now professor of Communication at the University of Illinois.[1] He has lectured in France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. He has contributed to the field of argumentation theory.

His work appeared in Communication Monographs, Communication Theory, Journal of the American Forensic Association, Quarterly Journal of Speech, and Argumentation.

Works

[edit]
  • Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs (1992). "Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme". In William L. Benoit; Dale Hample; Pamela J. Benoit (eds.). Readings in argumentation. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110135763. (appeared in The Quarterly Journal of Speech. LXVI, 251–265.)
  • Karen Tracy (1991). "Digressions in Argumentative Discourse". In Karen Tracy (ed.). Understanding face-to-face interaction: issues linking goals and discourse. Routledge. ISBN 978-0805809077.
  • Mark L. Knapp; John Augustine Daly, eds. (2002). "Language and Interpersonal Communication". Handbook of interpersonal communication. Sage. ISBN 978-0761921608.
  • F. H. van Eemeren; J. Anthony Blair; Charles A. Willard, eds. (2003). "Two Conceptions of Openness in Argumentation Theory". Anyone who has a view: theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation. Springer. ISBN 978-1402014550.

References

[edit]