Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a223df6bdbdb0bf5

Jump to content

Big Brake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Big Brake is a theoretical scientific model suggested as one of the possibilities for the ultimate fate of the universe – a possible cosmological singularity. In this model, the effect of dark energy reverses, causing the expansion of the universe to decelerate at an infinite rate, ultimately coming to a halt.[1]

Soft singularities

[edit]

In many singularities, such as the Big Rip, the Hubble parameter blows up, thus causing the scale factor and expansion rate of the universe to increase to infinity in a finite amount of time. This is due to the rise in the density of phantom dark energy, which accelerates the expansion of the universe in a feedback loop, causing the expansion to grow so intense that it overcomes all gravitational and physical bonds. This has catastrophic consequences, causing all the structures of the universe to be ripped apart, including atoms and nuclei, as each particle is now causally disconnected from all others.[citation needed]

The Big Brake model does not fall under the same category as such singularities. The Big Brake model falls under the category of cosmological singularities not connected with the divergence of the Hubble variable itself but of one of its higher derivatives.[2] The Big Brake singularity occurs at finite values of the Hubble parameter, scale factor and vanishing energy density, but diverging deceleration and infinite pressure.[3]

As the singularity occurs at a finite value of the Hubble parameter, while the first or higher derivatives of the Hubble parameter (in this case, the second derivative of the Hubble parameter and scale factor) are divergent, this implies the divergence of some curvature invariants.

These types of singularities are referred to as soft, quiescent, or sudden.[4] They are referred to as so due to the fact that, as the expansion rate appears to remain finite, there is a chance that the universe and the existence of matter 'survives'. Though, the divergent derivates mean that this type of 'survivable' singularity is still considered a singularity in general relativity, nonetheless.

Outcomes

[edit]

As this singularity is a soft one, it is expected that it may be possible for geodesic observers, as well as strings, to cross the singularity. Following the singularity, the tachyonic universe may eventually recollapse in a Big Crunch.[3]

It is also possible that matter may still exist after this soft singularity, though in a different form and organisation.[citation needed] Furthermore, cosmic matter may be subjected to extreme tidal forces and be destroyed.[citation needed] The consequences for space and time in these circumstances are also unclear.[5][6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. "Big Brake". www.onelook.com. Retrieved 2026-01-24.
  2. "Singularities and Black Holes > Non-Standard Singularities (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2026-01-24.
  3. 1 2 Keresztes, Zoltán; Gergely, László Á; Kamenshchik, Alexander Yu; Gorini, Vittorio; Polarski, David (2010-12-04), "Will the tachyonic universe survive the big brake?", Physical Review D, 82 (12) 123534, arXiv:1009.0776, Bibcode:2010PhRvD..82l3534K, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.123534
  4. Kamenshchik, Alexander Y.; Kiefer, Claus; Sandhöfer, Barbara (2007-09-27). "Quantum cosmology with a big-brake singularity". Physical Review D. 76 (6) 064032. arXiv:0705.1688. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..76f4032K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064032. ISSN 1550-7998. Archived from the original on 2024-06-02. Retrieved 2026-01-24.
  5. Musser, George (September 2010). "The Paradox of Time: Why It Can't Stop, But Must". Scientific American.
  6. "Could Time End?: Scientific American Podcast". Scientificamerican.com. Retrieved 2012-11-06.