Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a260fcba2de34c41

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the belief structure say? "I support you".

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belief structure is a distributed assessment with beliefs.

Evidential reasoning

[edit]

A belief structure is used in the evidential reasoning (ER) approach for multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to represent the performance of an alternative option on a criterion.

In the ER approach, an MCDA problem is modelled by a belief decision matrix instead of a conventional decision matrix. The difference between the two is that, in the former, each element is a belief structure; in the latter, conversely, each element is a single value (either numerical or textual).

Application

[edit]

For example, the quality of a car engine may be assessed to be “excellent” with a high degree of belief (e.g. 0.6) due to its low fuel consumption, low vibration and high responsiveness. At the same time, the quality may be assessed to be only “good” with a lower degree of belief (e.g. 0.4 or less) because its quietness and starting can still be improved. Such an assessment can be modeled by a belief structure: Si(engine)={(excellent, 0.6), (good, 0.4)}, where Si stands for the assessment of engine on the ith criterion (quality). In the belief structure, “excellent” and “good” are assessment standards, whilst “0.6” and “0.4” are degrees of belief.

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Shafer, G.A. (1976). Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.
  • Yang, J.B.; Xu, D.L. (2002). "On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty". IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans. 32 (3): 289–304. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802746.