Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a227f4a64c2497b7

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeIs a beech argument tree-mendously annoying?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The beech argument (German: Buchenargument) is a now mostly outdated argument in Indo-European studies that is in favour of placing the Indo-European Urheimat in an area west of a line connecting Kaliningrad and the Black Sea, based on the current distribution of European beech trees.[1][2] The argument, as summarised by Friedrich and Mallory goes that the Indo-European term *bʰāg(ó) most probably refers to the beech tree. Hence the presence of descendants of the term *bʰāg(ó) in Italic, Germanic, Albanian, Greek and (Indo-)Iranian, and potentially Celtic, Slavic, and Baltic languages, indicates that this word belonged to the Proto-Indo-European language. And thirdly that since the beech tree distribution was limited historically to the regions west of the Eurasian Steppe, this is where this language was spoken.[3][4]

Current distribution map of Fagus sylvatica (European beech)

However much like the similar salmon problem, the argument is now outdated; because the beech tree is climatically sensitive, the historical distribution of the beech tree was different from that of today, with certain species potentially extending to the Don River or to the Caucasus, and with the exception of the Kurdish buz, the related words for beech are only found in Western Indo-European languages.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Fisiak, Jacek (6 December 1996). Linguistic Reconstruction and Typology. De Gruyter Moyton. p. 188. ISBN 978-3-11-014905-0. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  2. "European Beech". European Forest Genetic Resources Program. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  3. Blažek, Václav (2002). "The 'beech'-argument — State-of-the-Art". Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics. 115 (2): 190–217. JSTOR 41289089.
  4. Pereltsvaig, Asya; Lewis, Martin (29 April 2015). The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. p. 186. ISBN 9781107054530. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  5. Pruthi, Raj (2004). Vedic Civilization. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House. p. 31. ISBN 81-7141-875-9. Retrieved 15 June 2020.