Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220b7abfd16addf

Jump to content

Bayesian regret

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In stochastic game theory, Bayesian regret is the expected difference ("regret") between the utility of a given strategy and the utility of the best possible strategy in hindsight—i.e., the strategy that would have maximized expected payoff if the true underlying model or distribution were known. This notion of regret measures how much is lost, on average, due to uncertainty or imperfect information.

Etymology

[edit]

The term Bayesian refers to Thomas Bayes (1702–1761), who proved a special case of what is now called Bayes' theorem, who provided the first mathematical treatment of a non-trivial problem of statistical data analysis using what is now known as Bayesian inference.

Economics

[edit]

This term has been used to compare a random buy-and-hold strategy to professional traders' records. This same concept has received numerous different names, as The New York Times notes:

"In 1957, for example, a statistician named James Hanna called his theorem Bayesian Regret. He had been preceded by David Blackwell, also a statistician, who called his theorem Controlled Random Walks.[1] Other, later papers had titles like 'On Pseudo Games',[2] 'How to Play an Unknown Game',[3] 'Universal Coding'[4] and 'Universal Portfolios'".[5][6]

References

[edit]
  1. Blackwell, David (1954). Controlled random walks (PDF). Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. 3. pp. 336–338.
  2. Banos, Alfredo (December 1968). "On Pseudo-Games". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 39 (6): 1932–1945. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177698023. ISSN 0003-4851.
  3. Harsanyi, John C. (1982), "Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model", Papers in Game Theory, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 115–138, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2527-9_6, ISBN 978-90-481-8369-2, retrieved 2023-06-13
  4. Rissanen, J. (July 1984). "Universal coding, information, prediction, and estimation". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 30 (4): 629–636. Bibcode:1984ITIT...30..629R. doi:10.1109/TIT.1984.1056936. ISSN 1557-9654. S2CID 206735464.
  5. Cover, Thomas M. (January 1991). "Universal Portfolios". Mathematical Finance. 1 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.1991.tb00002.x. ISSN 0960-1627. S2CID 219967240.
  6. Kolata, Gina (2006-02-05). "Pity the Scientist Who Discovers the Discovered". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-02-27.