Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22562155ba2122e

Jump to content

Arithmetic progression game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The arithmetic progression game is a positional game where two players alternately pick numbers, trying to occupy a complete arithmetic progression of a given size.

The game is parameterized by two integers n > k. The game-board is the set {1,...,n}. The winning-sets are all the arithmetic progressions of length k. In a Maker-Breaker game variant, the first player (Maker) wins by occupying a k-length arithmetic progression, otherwise the second player (Breaker) wins.

The game is also called the van der Waerden game,[1] named after Van der Waerden's theorem. It says that, for any k, there exists some integer W(2,k) such that, if the integers {1, ..., W(2,k)} are partitioned arbitrarily into two sets, then at least one set contains an arithmetic progression of length k. This means that, if , then Maker has a winning strategy.

This claim is not constructive - it does not show a specific strategy for Maker. Moreover, the current upper bound for W(2,k) is extremely large (the currently known bounds are: for every ).

Let W*(2,k) be the smallest integer such that Maker has a winning strategy. Beck[1] proves that . In particular, if , then the game is Maker's win (even though it is much smaller than the number that guarantees no-draw).

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Beck, József (1981). "Van der Waerden and Ramsey type games". Combinatorica. 1 (2): 103–116. doi:10.1007/bf02579267. ISSN 0209-9683.