Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2313d7f8c648043

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Antalas say to its friend? Let's atlas the situation.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Antalas
Chieftain of the Frexenses
Reignbefore 530 – after 548
Bornc.500

Antalas (Greek: Ἀντάλας; c. 500 – after 548) was a Berber tribal leader who played a major role in the wars of the Byzantine Empire against the Berber tribes in Africa.

Antalas and his tribe, the Frexes of which the Frechich who occupy the Algerian-Tunisian borders between Kasserine, Thala have retained the original name.[1] Initially they served the Byzantines as allies throught the foedus treaty, but after 544 switched sides due to Byzantines officials breaking the agreements by killing his brother Guarizila and cutting the annona subsides made as a tribute for peace and cooperation with others advantages of special citizenship notably for military services done by his people confederated to the empire during the war with the Vandals, whom started because of the Frexes and Antalas victory against king Hilderic army which provoked a coup by Gelimer alienating Justinian and giving him the casus belli for claiming africa for the eastern roman empire. Later the Frexes and their leader Antalas made a rebellious confederation with the Luwata (Basically original name of the Laguatan who were at the same time victim of similar treatements to Antalas and his people), Iforas and multiples tribes and even alliances with deserters such as Stotzas or usurpers such as Guntharic against the empire.

With the final Byzantine and imperial contingents of federated Berbers Ifisdaias (with his son Bitiptes), Cutzinas, Iabdas (with his son Bezina) victory in 548 made him and his tribe once again returning to their past situation of foederati while the saharans ones such as Luwata and Iforas were chased from the imperial territories. The main sources on his life are the epic panegyric poem Iohannis (in the honour of John Troglita) of Flavius Cresconius Corippus and the Histories of the Wars of Procopius of Caesarea historian of the byzantine imperial court also author of the Anecdota (also called Secret History) explaining more of the tyrannic issues inside the empire notably Nika massacres and the issues of the province of Africa resulting to the rebellion of the deserter Stotzas and the Frexes ruler Antalas during the rule of Justinian Ist the Emperor contemporary of Antalas.

Life

[edit]

Antalas was born c.500, and was the son of a certain Guenfan, according to Corippus. He belonged to Frexes tribe of Byzacena (modern central Tunisia).[2][3] Corippus reports that Antalas career began at the age of seventeen, stealing sheep. He soon gathered a cohort of followers around him and became a brigand, fighting against the Vandals. By 530, he had become leader of the Berbers in Byzacena, and in the same year led them to a decisive victory against the Vandals which resulted to the demise of King Hilderic and a crisis with the Byzantines due to that coup.[4]

Antalas' Rebellion

[edit]

Following the Vandalic War (533–534) and the capture of the Vandalic Kingdom by the Byzantine Empire, Antalas became an ally of the empire, receiving subsidies and supplies in exchange. In 543, however, a revolt broke out among the Berbers of Byzacena, which resulted in the execution of his brother Guarizila and the cessation of the subsidies by the Byzantine governor, Solomon. This treatment alienated Antalas, and when the Leuathae rebelled in Tripolitania in the next year, he and his followers joined them. The united tribes inflicted a heavy defeat on the Byzantines in the Battle of Cillium, where Solomon himself was killed.[5][6]

Roman and Byzantine Africa, with the provinces of Byzacena, Zeugitana and Numidia

With the death of the capable Solomon, his nephew Sergius, whose arrogant treatment of the Leuathae had prompted their rebellion in the first place, was appointed governor in Africa. Stotzas, a renegade Byzantine soldier who had led an unsuccessful rebellion a few years earlier, now joined Antalas from his refuge in Mauretania. Antalas wrote to the Byzantine emperor, Justinian I, asking for Sergius' dismissal, but in vain. Justinian only dispatched the patrician Areobindus in early 545 to share command with Sergius, but both were militarily incompetent and spent their time bickering with each other.[4][7] While Sergius remained inactive at Carthage, Antalas and Stotzas led their troops north and managed to trick Himerius, the commander of Hadrumetum (today modern Sousse, Tunisia and back then called Justianopolis in the honour of Emperor Justinian I Justiniano in latin meaning Justinian and Polis in greek meaning city because the city was a very important economic center as was byzacena the province it managed), into leaving the town with his troops and rendezvous with another Byzantine commander, John. Himerius fell into the trap, and while his soldiers mutinied and joined Stotzas, he was forced to betray Hadrumetum to save his life.[8] Finally, in late 545 Areobindus ordered the reluctant John to advance and meet the joint army of Antalas and Stotzas, which was encamped at Sicca Veneria. John's troops were considerably outnumbered by the rebel forces, and in the Battle of Thacia his army was routed and he himself was killed, but not before mortally wounding Stotzas in a duel.[7][9]

After the defeat at Thacia, Sergius was relieved and Areobindus replaced him. At this time, the ambitious Byzantine dux of Numidia, Guntharic contacted the various Berber leaders in a bid to unseat Areobindus. Antalas was promised the rule of Byzacena, half the treasure of Areobindus and 1,500 Byzantine troops as his command. In order to increase pressure on Areobindus, the Berbers and the renegade followers of Stotzas approached Carthage. At the same time, Areobindus himself had secret contacts with another Berber leader, Cutzinas, leader of the Numidian Berbers. Cutzinas had promised to murder Antalas once battle was joined, but Guntharic revealed this plan to Antalas. In the event, due to Areobindus' timidity, a battle did not take place; in March Guntharic seized Carthage and murdered Areobindus.[7][10]

Now master of Carthage, Guntharic refused to honour his agreement with Antalas, and the latter withdrew his men into Byzacena. There, in an effort to reconcile himself with the emperor, he contacted the dux of Byzacena, Marcentius, who had fled to an offshore island, proposing to make common cause against Guntharic. Guntharic sent an army under Cutzinas and Artabanes against Antalas and defeated him, but it is say by procopius that Artabanes blamed his troops ardor against the ennemy and it in fact betrays another part of the story told only by Corippus who by giving the word to Antalas in his poetry the Iohannis mention that there was another alliance of Antalas (allowing the murder and demise of Guntharic) with a Byzantine dignitary but again Artabanes as Guntharic and as Solomon before him all betrayed the agreements initially made with Antalas angering him, Corippus reports this throught a witness of the war the military tribune called Caecilid and others witnesses.[11][12] Guntharic himself was murdered soon after (May 546) by a conspiracy headed by Artabanes, and Carthage and the army returned to the Empire's allegiance. Justinian now sent an experienced soldier, John Troglita, to impose order on the troubled African provinces.[13] Gathering his forces, Troglita marched out of Carthage into Byzacena. Antalas sent an embassy to the Byzantine general, but the latter rejected his demands and imprisoned the envoys. Shortly after, he sent an emissary of his own, who placed Antalas before the choice of battle or immediate submission. Antalas refused to submit, and the two armies confronted each other near Sbeitla in Byzacena in late 546 or early 547. The battle resulted in a crushing Byzantine victory: the Berbers suffered heavy losses, and the battle-standards lost at Cillium were recovered by the Byzantines.[14][15]

In the summer, however, Antalas joined the Berbers of Tripolitania (though he is not mentioned by Corippus, Procopius records his presence) and inflicted a heavy defeat on Troglita at the Battle of Marta. After their victory, the Berbers raided even to the outskirts of Carthage.[15][16] In the next year, Antalas again joined the Tripolitanian Berbers, under their leader Carcasan, when they invaded Byzacena. In contrast to the impetuous Carcasan, Antalas advocated a more cautious scorched earth tactic when Troglita marched forth to meet them. Nevertheless, when the two adversaries met later in the summer in the Battle of the Fields of Cato, the result was a decisive Byzantine victory: Carcasan fell, and the Berber revolt was crushed as Antalas and the surviving leaders submitted to Troglita. Nothing further is known of him after that.[15][17]

References

[edit]
  1. "Antalas, G. Camps". journals.openedition.org. Retrieved 2026-05-26.
  2. Desanges, J. (1998-02-01). "Frexes". Encyclopédie berbère (in French) (19): 2935. doi:10.4000/encyclopedieberbere.1970. ISSN 1015-7344.
  3. Camps 1988, p. 706-708.
  4. 1 2 Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, p. 86.
  5. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 86, 1175–1176.
  6. Bury 1958, p. 145.
  7. 1 2 3 Bury 1958, p. 146.
  8. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 86, 599–600.
  9. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 86, 641.
  10. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 86–87, 108–109.
  11. "Corippus, Iohannis (in french from remacle.com, song IV)". remacle.org. Retrieved 2026-06-26. As for the king, he sits in their midst, and embracing them with his gaze, in a terrible voice he angrily pronounces these brief words: "Chiefs, after having welcomed the legate and the harsh proposals of John, I wanted to share them with you and allow you to hear his envoy, here present, explain his mission. As for you, listen to him attentively, and if you settle on some firm resolution, decide whether you choose peace or war. » He allows me to speak and with his finger imposes silence on their lips. I make them aware of the maxims and precepts of conduct of the prince my master. I remind them at length how, by his sovereign authority, he maintains the peace of the world; I exalt its indomitable valor, united with its gentleness. Often, using threats, I add that if the Romans know how to forgive, they have also always brought down proud peoples and overwhelmed powerful tyrants with their weapons; I cite all these peoples that all-powerful Rome, that our prince himself subjugated while they unleashed battles to the ends of the world. I assured them of war, then, turning back, I spoke to them of peace. Finally, finishing my speech, I requested their response. Then the barbarians animatedly, in a broken conversation, exchange among themselves varied clamors, hoarse and hissing sounds, and give way to intense terror. Like wolves in the mountains, when the clouds cover the vast lands, make the air echo with their repeated howls and their cries are heard within the deep shadows. As soon as their minds are calmed, the proud leader responds to me in these violent terms: "It is too well known to me, this Roman faith that you have just violated! Let no one now hope to deceive Antalas. It only takes one Armenian to do it once. You speak to me with artifice of your friendship for me. Wasn't I your friend too? have I not often fought with you? Did I not fight the war under your orders? Did I not, finally, Roman, fight for your generals? I attest our nation so faithful, I attest your blood, O my brother Guarizil, shed by the order of an unjust leader, I have to instruct me the reward that your Armenian granted me after, thanks to our valor, he had defeated the tyrant Guntharith. And I who showed myself so faithful to your alliance, who acquired so many titles to your recognition, who was so often the auxiliary of your victories, this is the worthy salary that I receive from you! This is why I fought for you! So is this your loyalty? Is this what we call friendship? Fortune, why have you not, by one of your favors, offered Artabane to my blows, now that by a change of destiny my valiant Ilacus people and the fierce peoples of the southern countries are masters in the camp! And it is these valiant people that your leader John is preparing to attack at the head of his weak troops! He thinks he can obtain our submission under proud conditions and, through a clever artifice, seeks to strike with vain terror those he should implore! After so many legitimate successes that my arm has won in the battles, after several of your generals have succumbed by my valor, after the death of the merciless Solomon and of John the first of his name, who will now dare to attack Antalas? Would the wolf fear the lamb that feeds in the valleys? Would the lion fear the stag with emerging horns? Would the dog with the formidable mouth tremble before the hare or the deer? would the fierce vulture flee from the gentle dove under the clouds? Will we ever see the satellite of Jupiter, terrified, fleeing through the liquid air in front of the crane with its resounding cry or the harmonious swan? "Will the universe, changing its aspect, perish in an upheaval? It pleases the Romans, defeated so many times, to fight again: so let them retrace their steps and try the chance of a fight! »
  12. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 87, 818.
  13. Bury 1958, pp. 146–147.
  14. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 87, 647.
  15. 1 2 3 Bury 1958, p. 147.
  16. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 87, 647–648.
  17. Martindale, Jones & Morris 1992, pp. 87, 648–649.

Sources

[edit]