Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a222c6e2daebf54b

Jump to content

Amitsur complex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In algebra, the Amitsur complex is a natural complex associated to a ring homomorphism. It was introduced by Shimshon Amitsur.[1] When the homomorphism is faithfully flat, the Amitsur complex is exact (thus determining a resolution), which is the basis of the theory of faithfully flat descent.

The notion should be thought of as a mechanism to go beyond the conventional localization of rings and modules.[2]

Definition

[edit source]

Let be a homomorphism of (not-necessary-commutative) rings. First define the cosimplicial set (where refers to , not ) as follows. Define the face maps by inserting at the th spot:[a]

Define the degeneracies by multiplying out the th and th spots:

They satisfy the "obvious" cosimplicial identities and thus is a cosimplicial set. It then determines the complex with the augumentation , the Amitsur complex:[3]

where

Exactness of the Amitsur complex

[edit source]

Faithfully flat case

[edit source]

In the above notations, if is right faithfully flat, then a theorem of Alexander Grothendieck states that the (augmented) complex is exact and thus is a resolution. More generally, if is right faithfully flat, then, for each left -module ,

is exact.[4]

Proof:

Step 1: The statement is true if splits as a ring homomorphism.

That " splits" is to say for some homomorphism ( is a retraction and a section). Given such a , define

by

An easy computation shows the following identity: with ,

.

This is to say that is a homotopy operator and so determines the zero map on cohomology: i.e., the complex is exact.

Step 2: The statement is true in general.

We remark that is a section of . Thus, Step 1 applied to the split ring homomorphism implies:

where , is exact. Since , etc., by "faithfully flat", the original sequence is exact.

Arc topology case

[edit source]

Bhatt and Scholze[5] show that the Amitsur complex is exact if and are (commutative) perfect rings, and the map is required to be a covering in the arc topology (which is a weaker condition than being a cover in the flat topology).

  1. The reference (M. Artin) seems to have a typo, and this should be the correct formula; see the calculation of and in the note.

Citations

[edit source]
  1. Amitsur (1959).
  2. Artin (1999), III.7.
  3. Artin (1999), III.6.
  4. Artin (1999), theorem III.6.6.
  5. Bhatt & Scholze (2022), proposition 8.10.

References

[edit source]
  • Amitsur, Shimshon (1959). "Simple algebras and cohomology groups of arbitrary fields". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 90 (1): 73–112. JSTOR 1993268.