Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a234131c6d3bdfff

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did allotopy say? "I've got a lot to change.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In a story, an allotopy is when two basic meaning traits (semes) contradict each other; that is, when they trace two incompatible interpretations. It was conceived as being the opposite of an isotopy, which is the homogeneity resulting from repetition of the same seme.[1] The concept was coined in the 1970s by the Belgian semioticians known as Groupe μ.

History

[edit]

In the 1970, the Belgian semioticians known under the name Groupe μ, introduced the concept of Allotopy.[2] They first discussed the concept in publications like Isotopie et allotopie,[3] Isotopie, allotopie et polytopie (1976),[4] and A Rhetoric of Poetry (1977).[5]

Allotopy and humor

[edit]

Groupe μ discussed the relation of allotopy to jokes and humor.[citation needed] Salvatore Attardo, despite not using the term allotopy, formulated a theory of humor based on the idea of the "incompatible interpretations", called the isotopy-disjunction model.[6][7] This is part of the broader idea of defining humor as based on contradiction/incongruity.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. Jean-Marie Klinkenberg (1996) Précis de sémiotique générale, De Boeck, p. 118 Archived 2011-07-13 at the Wayback Machine
  2. "Définition de : l'allotopie". Archived from the original on 2010-03-12. Retrieved 2010-06-20.
  3. DUBOIS J.; EDELINE F.; KLINKENBERG J.-M.; MINGUET P. (1976) Isotopie et allotopie: le fonctionnement rhétorique du texte, no14, pp. 41-65 (2 p.)
  4. Groupe μ (1976) Isotopie, allotopie et polytopie : le texte rhétorique, Versus, 14, 1 976
  5. Groupe μ (1977)
  6. Salvatore Attardo (2001) Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis, sect.5.3.2, p.83
  7. Salvatore Attardo (1994) Linguistic theories of humor, chap.2
  8. The sign in Paris semiotics[permanent dead link], Semiotica. Volume 111, Issue 1-2, Pages 1–34, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, doi:10.1515/semi.1996.111.1-2.1, //1996

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]