Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2ab4702bfdb97b7

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Allee v. Medrano say to the judge? "You've got a case to med-rano around.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Allee v. Medrano
Decided May 20, 1974
Full case nameAllee v. Medrano
Citations416 U.S. 802 (more)
Holding
Police officers' interference with a strike was a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
MajorityDouglas
Concur/dissentBurger, joined by White, Rehnquist
Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Allee v. Medrano, 416 U.S. 802 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers' interference with a strike was a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.[1][2]

Background

[edit]

From June 1966 to June 1967, unionists attempted to unionize farmworkers and persuade them to support or join a labor strike. They were subjected to persistent harassment and violence by Texas Rangers. In July 1967, a state court issued a temporary injunction against the unionists, proscribing picketing on or near property of one of the major employers in the area. The unionists filed a federal civil rights action under Section 1983, attacking the constitutionality of certain Texas statutes and alleging that the law-enforcement officers conspired to deprive the unionists of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. A three-judge federal district court declared five of the statutes unconstitutional and enjoined their enforcement, and in addition permanently enjoined the officers from intimidating the unionists in their organizational efforts.[1][3][4]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Allee v. Medrano, 416 U.S. 802 (1974).
  2. Lareau, N. Peter (May 2014) [2003]. Labor and Employment Law. pp. 19-4.
  3. Pate, Stephen P. (Spring 2021). "Viva la Huelga! The Starr County Strike, Chicanos, Texas Rangers and the Landmark Supreme Court Decision in Medrano v. Allee". Journal of the Texas Supreme Court Historical Society (3): 10.
  4. Abram Chayes, Foreword: Public Law Litigation and the Burger Court , 96 HARV. L. REV. 4, 19-20 (November 1982).
[edit]

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.