Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellman's (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator as per this comment. (non-admin closure) SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC)reply

Ellman's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as only one source was found on Google. Bryce M (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:29, 1 March 2026 (UTC)reply

*Deletesingularly sourced failing WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV. Keep after expansive and impressive WP:HEY by user:TenPoundHammer Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 19:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Looks like the 2008 nomination found some other sources. I found this non-rs blog post , a merger filing, and this study about advertising that isn't showing up correctly in previews. These suggest other sources may exist, likely in newspapers.
SenshiSun (talk) 20:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.