Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellman's
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 17:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Ellman's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The only sources I'm finding about this chain pertain directly to its purchase by Service Merchandise. I'm finding nothing in the news sources that asserts any sort of notability for this regional chain. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 20:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. There are enough details in the coverage of the takeover to confirm the number of stores and the states in which the company operated. --Eastmain (talk) 21:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- But if all the coverage deals only with the Service Merchandise takeover, is it really notable? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 00:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps. The first few listings at http://books.google.com/books?q=Ellman%27s+catalog&btnG=Search+Books&lr= include some references to the company that might be useful for expanding the article. Since the company was only around until 1985, there may be further references only available in print. Note that web searches for
Ellman'swill also give results forEllman's reagent. Everything considered, I would prefer to keep the article. --Eastmain (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps. The first few listings at http://books.google.com/books?q=Ellman%27s+catalog&btnG=Search+Books&lr= include some references to the company that might be useful for expanding the article. Since the company was only around until 1985, there may be further references only available in print. Note that web searches for
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 15:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep - It appears the company was once Atlanta's largest catalog showroom firm. Though online sourcing is thin, it does exist. Most sources probably will be offline. --Clubjuggle T/C 16:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.