Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can't Hang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep all (effectively no consensus default to Keep) except merge the two mentioned in this close. I'm not sure what's happening here. ALL of these songs (bar Do You Want To, which was a double A-side with Can't Hang and should therefore share an article - which I've done), were top 50 Billboard hits. Indeed, five of them were Top 10 hits - WP:MUSIC#SONGS is quite clear here that such songs are notable. Thus I had to interpret one editor's Delete !vote as an actual Keep, as he said that the charting songs should stay. The three which achieved lower charting positions may be of dubious independent notability, but that's an editorial decision to redirect to the parent album. Black Kite 00:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply

Can't Hang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)(View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recommending deletion or merging per WP:NSONG. These articles could conceivably be merged into Xscape (band), Xscape discography, articles about the album in which each single appears, or even a new article like Xscape singles. Looking for a ruling on notability of these individual songs, and whether they each deserve their own individual article. For most of these, the only GHits are lyrics pages. SnottyWong talk 13:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)reply

List of articles nominated:


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.