Template talk:Centralized talk page

Lovely

Happy-melon: Thanks for making this template, it is lovely! And very nice choice of icon.

Was it on purpose you added the noinclude tags with a newline between them so the template causes extra space below it when used? As can be seen above.

--David Göthberg (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

No, not deliberate: if you check the history you'll see that I added category:Talk page templates in there before realising that I was moving on autopilot, and removed it. I didn't realise it was adding whitespace elsewhere... Happy‑melon 16:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes. So I removed the includeonlys and the newline.

(This seems to be a fact of life for us programmers: No matter how much we check our code, the next programmer that looks at it finds something to fix.)

--David Göthberg (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 18 October 2025

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Template:Central → Template:Centralized talk page – Problematic since you get this when you are editing phonetics articles when you forgot or didn't know the name is central articulation. Also, this proposed title is better and renaming the template central articulation to central would be more consistent with how we name other phonetics templates like {{Template:Lateral}} or {{Template:Nasal}}. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 20:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:59, 25 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 15:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Even if this template does get renamed (I have no opinion on that), the redirect left at Template:Central shouldn't be changed to point to your articulation-related template without wider discussion. If you're concerned about regularity of naming for your articulation templates, why not rename the others like Template:Lateral articulation and Template:Nasal articulation? Anomie⚔ 22:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose given Anomie's comment there's no convincing reason for a move here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Support: Template function should be clear from the template name (WP:TG) and "Central" is not clear. "Centralized talk page" is the correct term for WP:TALKCENT. The move redirect should remain as above. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 20:25, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose - Multiple spellings exist (e.g. centralised and centralized). Spectritus (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

  Even if you spell it {{Centralised talk page}} the template will still work. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 14:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support some kind of move away from the current title, so I guess the nominator's option works okay as a choice I'm rather agnostic over. At its current title, this page could easily be confused with Template:Centralized discussion. (With that being said, I currently have no opinion on what happens to the leftover redirect afterwards.) Steel1943 (talk) 09:58, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.