Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Gandhara

(Redirected from Gandharan)

Gandhāra
Gandhara
Gandhara is located in Pakistan
Gandhara
Gandhara
Location of Gandhara in South Asia (Afghanistan and Pakistan)
Approximate geographical region of Gandhara centered on the Peshawar Basin, in present-day northwest Pakistan
CapitalPushkalavati
Purushapura
Kapisa
Taxila
Hund
Government
Raja 
 c.6th/5th cent. BCE
Pushkarasarin
 c.330 BCE
Taxiles
 c.321 BCE
Chandragupta Maurya
 c.46 CE
Sases
 c.127 CE
Kanishka
 c.514 CE
Mihirakula
 964 1001
Jayapala
Historical eraAntiquity
Today part ofPakistan
Afghanistan

Gandhara (IAST: Gandhāra) was an ancient Indo-Aryan[1] culture and historical region[2] located in what is now northwestern Pakistan and northeastern Afghanistan.[3][4] Situated at the crossroads of Central and South Asia, it was known for its influential Buddhist culture and absorbed diverse influences from neighbouring areas.[5][1][2] The core of the region of Gandhara was the Valley of Peshawar, though the cultural influence of "Greater Gandhara" extended across the Indus River to Taxila and westwards into the Kabul Valley as far as Bamyan, and northwards up to the Karakoram range, including Swat, Bajaur and other valleys.[6][7]

Gandhara is named after the Gandhara tribe of the Vedic period, who are attested in the Rigveda (c. 1500 – c. 1200 BCE). Indo-Aryans migrated into the region sometimes between 1900 and 1500 BCE, and mixed with the local population.[a] The Gandhara grave culture (c. 1400–800 BCE)[8] has sometimes been taken as a representative of Indo-Aryan migrations, although it has also been regarded as a local development or a combination of the two.

Gandhara was recognised as one of the sixteen mahajanapadas ("great realms") by the 6th century BCE. It was annexed in the late 6th century BCE by the Achaemenid Empire as the satrapy of Gandāra.[9][10] During its invasion by Alexander the Great in 327–326 BCE, Gandhara was divided among various polities, notably that of Taxila under king Omphis and the tribes of Aśvaka.[11]

Gandhara became a part of the Maurya Empire in 321 BCE.[12] In the succeeding centuries it was ruled by the Indo-Greeks, the Indo-Scythians, and the Indo-Parthians; Apracharajas, a regional Gandharan dynasty whose rulers carried the title of Lord of Gandhara,[b] remained autonomous in some parts until the ascent of the Kushan Empire, which saw the zenith of region's cultural and political influence. Gandhara was devastated during the Hunnic invasions, but existed as a core region of the Turk Shahis and Hindu Shahis, before Gandhara as a geographical term faded into obscurity after the Ghaznavid conquest.

Gandhara was a major centre for Greco-Buddhism (4th c. BCE – 5th c. CE) under the Indo-Greeks and Gandharan Buddhism under later dynasties; Gandhara was also the central location for the Silk Road transmission of Buddhism to Central and East Asia,[13] and was famed for its unique Gandharan style of art influenced by the classical Hellenistic styles. Gandhārī, an Indo-Aryan language written in the Kharosthi script, acted as a lingua franca of the region.

Etymology

[edit]

Gandhara was known in Sanskrit as Gandhāraḥ (गन्धारः) and in Avestan as 'Vaēkərəta. In Old Persian, Gandhara was known as Gadāra (𐎥𐎭𐎠𐎼, also transliterated as Gandāra since the nasal "n" before consonants were omitted in Old Persian).[14] In Chinese, Gandhara is known as Jiāntuóluó (traditional Chinese: 犍陀羅; simplified Chinese: 犍陀罗, also written 健馱邏; 健驮逻), with the Middle Chinese pronunciation reconstructed as kɨɐndala. One state of the region named Jìbīn (罽賓; 罽宾, also romanised as Kipin) is recorded in the Book of Han.

One proposed origin of the name is from the Sanskrit word gandhaḥ (गन्धः), meaning "perfume" and "referring to the spices and aromatic herbs which they (the inhabitants) traded and with which they anointed themselves".[15][16] The Gandhari people are a tribe mentioned in the Rigveda, the Atharvaveda, and later Vedic texts.[17] A Persian form of the name, Gandara, mentioned in the Behistun inscription of Emperor Darius I,[18][19] was translated as Paruparaesanna (Para-upari-sena, meaning "beyond the Hindu Kush") in Babylonian and Elamite in the same inscription.[20] In Greek, Gandhara was known as Paropamisadae.[21]

Geography

[edit]

The geographical extent of Gandhara underwent much alteration throughout history, with the core being the region bounded by the Indus River, the Swat Valley, and the Kabul River.[22] Its prominent urban centres were Taxila and Pushkalavati.[23] The cultural influence of Gandhara stretched as far as Jhelum River in the east as evident by the discovery of Gandhara style Buddhist artworks there.[24][25][26] One Jataka includes Kashmir within Gandhara.[27] The kingdom of Taxila stretched from the Indus to the Hydaspes during the rule of Taxiles in 326 BCE.[28]

Richard Solomon uses the term "Greater Gandhara" to describe the extent of the cultural influence of Gandhara and its language, Gandhari.[29] In the later historical sources, Greater Gandhara encompassed the territories of Jibin and Oddiyana, extending into parts of Bactria and the Tarim Basin. Oddiyana was situated in the vicinity of the Swat Valley, while Jibin corresponded to the region of Kapisa, south of the Hindu Kush.[30]

The Udichya region was noted by 6th century BCE scholar Pāṇini as comprising both the regions of Vahika and Gandhara.[31]

History

[edit]

Vedic period (c. 1500-500 BCE)

[edit]

Gandhāra grave culture (c. 1400-800 BCE)

[edit]
Cremation urn, Gandhara grave culture, Swat Valley, c.1200 BCE

The Gandhara Grave Culture emerged c.1400 BCE and lasted until 800 BCE,[8] and was named for their distinct funerary practices. It was found along the Middle Swat River course, even though earlier research considered it to be expanded to the Valleys of Dir, Kunar, Chitral, and Peshawar.[32] It has been regarded as a token of the Indo-Aryan migrations but has also been explained by local cultural continuity. DNA analyses shows that inhabitants of the Swat area mixed with Indo-Aryans coming from the Inner Asia Mountain Corridor, who carried Steppe ancestry, sometime between 1900 and 1500 BCE.[a]

Early Vedic period (c. 1500-1100 BCE)

[edit]
Location of the Gāndhārīs the Vedic tribes.

The first mention of the Gandhārīs is in the Ṛigveda, as a tribe that has sheep with good wool. In the Atharvaveda, the Gandhārīs are mentioned alongside the Mūjavants, the Āṅgeyas and the Māgadhīs in a hymn asking fever to leave the body of the sick man and instead go those aforementioned tribes. The tribes listed were the furthermost border tribes known to those in Madhyadeśa, the Āṅgeyas and Māgadhīs in the east, and the Mūjavants and Gandhārīs in the north.[34][35]

The Gandhara tribe, after which it is named, is attested in the Rigveda (c.1500 – c.1200 BCE),[36][37] while the region is mentioned in the Zoroastrian Avesta as Vaēkərəta, the seventh most beautiful place on earth created by Ahura Mazda.

According to Rigvedic tradition, Yayati was the progenitor of the prominent Udichya (Gandhara and Vahika tribes) and had numerous sons, including Anu, Puru, and Druhyu. The lineage of Anu gave rise to the Madra, Kekaya, Sivi and Uśīnara kingdoms, while the Druhyu tribe has been associated with the Gandhara kingdom.[38]

Late Vedic period (c. 1100-500 BCE)

[edit]
Location of Gandhāra during the late Vedic period.

The Gāndhārī king Nagnajit and his son Svarajit are mentioned in the Brāhmaṇas (900-700 BCE), according to which they received Brahmanic consecration, but their family's attitude towards ritual is mentioned negatively,[39] with the royal family of Gandhāra during this period following non-Brahmanical religious traditions. According to the Jain Uttarādhyayana-sūtra, Nagnajit, or Naggaji, was a prominent king who had adopted Jainism and was comparable to Dvimukha of Pāñcāla, Nimi of Videha, Karakaṇḍu of Kaliṅga, and Bhīma of Vidarbha; Buddhist sources instead claim that he had achieved paccekabuddhayāna.[40][41][42]

By the later Vedic period the Gāndhārī capital of Takṣaśila had become an important centre of knowledge[citation needed] where the men of Madhya-desa went to learn the three Vedas and the eighteen branches of knowledge,[citation needed] with the Kauśītaki Brāhmaṇa recording that brāhmaṇas went north to study.[citation needed] According to the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the Uddālaka Jātaka, the famous Vedic philosopher Uddālaka Āruṇi was among the famous students of Takṣaśila, and the Setaketu Jātaka claims that his son Śvetaketu also studied there.[citation needed] In the Chāndogya Upaniṣad, Uddālaka Āruṇi himself favourably referred to Gāndhārī education to the Vaideha king Janaka.[39]

Mahajanapadas (6th c. BCE)

[edit]

During the 6th century BCE, Gandhāra was an important imperial power in north-west Iron Age South Asia, with the valley of Kaśmīra being part of the kingdom.[40] Due to this important position, Buddhist texts listed the Gandhāra kingdom as one of the sixteen Mahājanapadas ("great realms") of Iron Age South Asia. It was the home of Gandhari, the princess and her brother Shakuni the king of Gandhara Kingdom.[43][44]

Achaemenid (Persian) rule (6th-4th cent. BCE BCE)

[edit]
Map of ancient India, c.500 BCE, with the Persian frontier delineated along the Indus River and the Jhelum River[45][46][47][48]

Achaemenid conquest bt Cyrus the Great (535-518 BCE)

[edit]
Gandāra soldier from the tomb of Xerxes I, c.470 BCE

Around 535 BCE, the Persian king Cyrus the Great initiated a protracted campaign to absorb parts of northwestern Indian subcontinent into his nascent Achaemenid Empire.[45] In this initial incursion, the Persian army annexed a large region to the west of the Indus River, consolidating the early eastern borders of their new realm. With a brief pause after Cyrus' death around 530 BCE, the campaign continued under Darius the Great, who began to re-conquer former provinces and further expand the Achaemenid Empire's political boundaries. Around 518 BCE, the Persian army pushed further into India to initiate a second period of conquest by annexing regions up to the Jhelum River in what is today known as Punjab.[49] At peak, the Persians managed to take control of most of modern-day Pakistan and incorporate it into their territory.

Megasthenes' Indica states that the Achaemenids never conquered India, and had only approached its borders after battling with the Massagetae. It further states that the Persians summoned mercenaries specifically from the Oxydrakai tribe, who were previously known to have resisted the incursions of Alexander the Great, but they never entered their armies into the region of Gandhara.[50]

Centralised administration and Kharosthi script

[edit]

Under Persian rule, a system of centralised administration, with a bureaucratic system, was introduced into the Indus Valley for the first time. Provinces or "satrapies" were established with provincial capitals. The Gandhara satrapy, established 518 BCE with its capital at Pushkalavati (Charsadda).[51]

It was also during the Achaemenid Empire rule of Gandhara that the Kharosthi script, the script of Gandhari prakrit, was born through the Aramaic alphabet.[52]

Gandharan troops employed by Xerxes I "the Great" (c. 518 BC – 465 BC)

[edit]
Athenian tetradrachm (c.500/490–485 BCE) discovered in Pushkalavati. This coin is the earliest known example of its type to be found so far east.[53] Such coins were circulating in the area as currency, at least as far as the Indus, during the reign of the Achaemenids.[54][55][56][57]

During the reign of Xerxes I, Gandharan troops were noted by Herodotus to have taken part in the Second Persian invasion of Greece and were described as clothed similar to that of the Bactrians.[58] Herodotus states that during the battle they were led by the Achamenid general Artyphius.[59]

Conquest by Alexander the Great (327 BCE)

[edit]

In 327 BCE, Alexander the Great's military campaign progressed to Arigaum, on the western fringe of Gandhara and situated in present-day Nawagai, marking the initial encounter with the Gandharian Aspasians. Arrian (c. 86/89 – c. after 146/160 CE), in his Anabasis of Alexander, recalls their implementation of a scorched earth strategy, evidenced by the city ablaze upon Alexander's arrival, with its inhabitants already fleeing.[c] The Aspasians fiercely contested Alexander's forces, resulting in their eventual defeat.

According to Arrian's Indica, the region west of the Indus River was inhabited by two tribes, the Assakenoi (Asvakas) and Astakanoi, whom he describes as 'Indian' and occupying the two great cities of Massaga, located in the Swat valley, and Pushkalavati, in modern day Peshawar.[60]

Alexander traversed the River Guraeus in the contemporary Dir District, engaging with the Gandharian Asvakas, as chronicled in Sanskrit literature.[d] The primary stronghold among the Asvakas, Massaga, characterised as strongly fortified by Quintus Curtius Rufus, became a focal point.[61] Despite an initial standoff which led to Alexander being struck in the leg by an Asvaka arrow,[e] peace terms were negotiated between the Queen of Massaga and Alexander. However, when the defenders had vacated the fort, a fierce battle ensued when Alexander broke the treaty. According to Diodorus Siculus (1st century BCE), the Asvakas, including women fighting alongside their husbands, valiantly resisted Alexander's army but were ultimately defeated.[f]

East of Pushkalavati, the sovereign of Taxila, Omphis, formed an alliance with Alexander the Great, motivated by a longstanding animosity towards Porus, who ruled the Gandharian region encompassed by the Chenab and Jhelum River.[g] Omphis, in a gesture of goodwill, presented Alexander with significant gifts, esteemed among the Indian populace, and subsequently accompanied him on the expedition crossing the Indus.[h]

Mauryan Gandhāra (3th cent. BCE)

[edit]
Major Rock Edict of Ashoka in Mansehra

During the Mauryan era, Gandhara held a pivotal position as a core territory within the empire, with Taxila serving as the provincial capital of the North West.[62]

After Alexander's death, Chandragupta Maurya allied with Trigarta king Parvataka to conquer the Nanda Empire.[63] This alliance resulted in the formation of a composite army, comprising Gandharans and Kambojas, as documented in the Mudrarakshasa,[64] and the establishment of the short-lived Mauryan Empire.

The reign of Chandragupta's successor Bindusara witnessed a rebellion among the locals of Taxila, to which Bindusara,according to the Ashokavadana, dispatched his son Ashoka to quell the uprising. Upon entering the city, the populace conveyed that their rebellion was not against Ashoka or Bindusara but rather against oppressive ministers.[65] In Ashoka's subsequent tenure as emperor, he appointed his son as the new governor of Taxila.[66] During this time, Ashoka erected numerous rock edicts in the region in the Kharosthi script and commissioned the construction of a monumental stupa in Pushkalavati, Western Gandhara, the location of which remains undiscovered to date.[67]

According to Taranatha, following the death of Ashoka (died 232 BCE), the "north-western half of India" seceded from the Maurya Empire, and Virasena emerged as its king.[68] Noteworthy for his diplomatic endeavours, Virasena's successor, Subhagasena (last decades of 3rd century BCE), maintained relations with the Seleucid Greeks. This engagement is corroborated by Polybius, who records an instance where Antiochus III the Great descended into India to renew his ties with King Subhagasena in 206 BCE, subsequently receiving a substantial gift of 150 elephants from the monarch.[69][70]

Greek kingdoms (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. CE)

[edit]

Greco-Bactrian rule (c. 180 BCE – c. 150 BCE)

[edit]

The Greco-Bactrian Kingdom (256 BCE – c. 120 BCE) was a Greek kingdom during the Hellenistic period[71][72][73] located in Central Asia and Afghanistan. The kingdom was founded by the Seleucid satrap Diodotus I Soter in about 256 BC, and continued to dominate Central Asia until its fall around 120 BC.[i]

Demetrius I of Bactria of Bactria (reign c. 200 BCE-c. 180 BCE) started an invasion of the Indian subcontinent before 180 BCE. His conquests were mentioned by the historian Strabo along with that of Menander. The invasion was completed by 175 BC. This established in the northwestern Indian Subcontinent what is called the Indo-Greek Kingdom, dividing the Greeks to the east of the Seleucid Empire to the Graeco-Bactrian Kingdom and the Indo-Greek Kingdoms.[74]

Indo-Greek kingdoms (2nd-1st cent. BCE)

[edit]
The founder of the Indo-Greek Kingdom Demetrius I (205–171 BCE), wearing the scalp of an elephant, symbol of his conquest of the Indus valley

The Indo-Greek king Menander I (reigned 155–130 BCE) drove the Greco-Bactrians out of Gandhara and beyond the Hindu Kush, becoming king shortly after his victory.

His empire survived him in a fragmented manner until the last independent Greek king, Strato II, disappeared around 10 CE, who may have been supplanted by the Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps, particularly Rajuvula and Bhadayasa, whose coins were often copied on those of the last Indo-Greek kings.[75]

Around 125 BCE, the Greco-Bactrian king Heliocles, son of Eucratides, fled from the Yuezhi invasion of Bactria and relocated to Gandhara, pushing the Indo-Greeks east of the Jhelum River. The last known Indo-Greek ruler was Theodamas, from the Bajaur area of Gandhara, mentioned on a 1st-century CE signet ring, bearing the Kharoṣṭhī inscription "Su Theodamasa" ("Su" was the Greek transliteration of the Kushan royal title "Shau" ("Shah" or "King")).

It is during this period that the fusion of Hellenistic and South Asian mythological, artistic and religious elements becomes most apparent, especially in the region of Gandhara.[citation needed] The Buddhist faith flourished under the Indo-Greek kings, especially Menander who was arguably the most powerful of them all, and figured in the Buddhist text Milinda Panha. It was also a period of great cultural syncretism, exemplified by the development of Greco-Buddhism in the region of Gandhara.

Local Greek rulers still exercised a feeble and precarious power along the borderland, but the last vestige of the Greco-Indian rulers was finished by a people known to the old Chinese as the Yuezhi,[76] who founded the Kushan Empire and expanded to the east during the 1st century CE.

Apracharajas (1st cent. BCE–78 CE)
[edit]

The Apracharajas, also known as Avacarajas,[77] were a local ruling dynasty situated in the region of Gandhara, ruling from the time of the governance of Menander II (90–85/65 BCE) within the Indo-Greek Kingdom, during Indo-Parthian rule in the 1st c. CE, and ending with the establishment of Kushan rule in 78 CE. Their capital, known as Apracapura or Avacapura, was located in Bajaur,[77] and their principal domain was between Taxila and Bajaur.[j] Archaeological evidence establishes dynastic affiliations between them and the rulers of Oddiyana in modern-day Swat.[k]

Indo-Parthian rule (1st c. CE)

[edit]
Ancient Buddhist monastery Takht-i-Bahi (a UNESCO World Heritage Site) constructed by the Indo-Parthians

The Indo-Parthian Kingdom (19 CE–226 CE) was founded in 19/20 when the governor of Drangiana (Sakastan) Gondophares (19-46 CE)[78] declared independence from the Parthian Empire. He would later make expeditions to the east, conquer territory from the Indo-Scythians and Indo-Greeks and thus transforming his kingdom into an empire.[l][80] The domains of the Indo-Parthians were greatly reduced following the invasions of the Kushans in the second half of the 1st century. They managed to retain control of Sakastan, until its conquest by the Sasanian Empire in c. 224/5.[81]

The Indo-Parthian Kingdom was ruled by the Gondopharid dynasty, named after its first ruler Gondophares. These kings have traditionally been referred to as Indo-Parthians, as their coinage was often inspired by the Arsacid dynasty, but they probably belonged to wider groups of Iranic tribes who lived east of Parthia proper, and there is no evidence that all the kings who assumed the title Gondophares, which means "Holder of Glory", were even related.

During the dominion of the Indo-Parthians, Apracharaja Sasan, as described on numismatic evidence identifying him as the nephew of Aspavarma, emerged as a figure of significance.[82]

In 46 CE Philostratus and Apollonius of Tyana visted Gondophares's successor Phraotes. They describe his kingdom as containing the old territory of Porus.[83] Following an exchange with the king, Phraotes is reported to have subsidised both barbarians and neighbouring states, to avert incursions into his kingdom.[84]

According to Philostratus and Apollonius of Tyana, the Gandharans living between the Kabul River and Taxila had houses appearing as single-story structures from the outside, but upon entering, underground rooms were also present.[85] They describe Taxila as being the same size as Nineveh, being walled like a Greek city whilst also being shaped with Narrow roads.[86][87]

Kushan rule and Indo-Scythian kingdom (1st–4th cent. CE)

[edit]

Yuezhi and the Kushan Empire

[edit]
A map of India in the 2nd century AD showing the extent of the Kushan Empire (in brown) during the reign of Kanishka. Most historians consider the empire to have variously extended as far east as the middle Ganges plain,[88] to Varanasi in the eastern Gangetic plain,[89][90] or probably even Pataliputra.[91][92]

The Yuezhi were an ancient people first described in Chinese histories as nomadic pastoralists living in an arid grassland area in the western part of the modern Chinese province of Gansu, during the 1st millennium BC. After a major defeat at the hands of the Xiongnu in 176 BC, the Yuezhi split into two groups migrating in different directions: the Greater Yuezhi[m] and Lesser Yuezhi.[n] This started a complex domino effect that radiated in all directions and, in the process, set the course of history for much of Asia for centuries to come.[93] The migration of the Yuezhi pushed the Sakas (Scythians) southwards into South Asia.

Indo-Scythian rule (c. 80 BCE–1st/2n cent. CE)

[edit]
One of the Buner reliefs showing Scythian soldiers dancing. Cleveland Museum of Art.

The presence of the Scythians in modern Pakistan and north-western India during the first century BCE was contemporaneous with the Indo-Greek kingdoms there, and they apparently initially recognized the power of the local Greek rulers. Maues first conquered Gandhara and Taxila in present-day Afghanistan and Pakistan c.80 BCE, but his kingdom disintegrated after his death. In the east, the Indian king Vikrama retook Ujjain from the Indo-Scythians and celebrated his victory by establishing the Vikrama era in 58 BCE. Indo-Greek kings again ruled and prospered after Maues, as indicated by the profusion of coins from Kings Apollodotus II and Hippostratos. In 55 BCE, under Azes I, the Indo-Scythians took control of northwestern India with their victory over Hippostratos.

The Indo-Scythians were descended from the Sakas (Scythians), who were displaced by the Yuezhi, and migrated from Central Asia into South Asia from the middle of the 2nd century BCE to the 1st century BCE. The Indo-Scythians in turn displaced the Indo-Greeks, and ruled a kingdom (c. 150 BCE–400 CE) that stretched from Gandhara to Mathura. The first Indo-Scythian king Maues established Saka hegemony by conquering Indo-Greek territories.[94] The Indo-Scythian migrations had lasting effects on Bactria, Kabul and the Indian subcontinent and Rome and Parthia in the west. Ancient Roman historians, including Arrian[95] and Claudius Ptolemy, have mentioned that the ancient Sakas ("Sakai") were nomadic people.[96] The first rulers of the Indo-Scythian kingdom were Maues (c. 85–60 BCE) and Vonones (c. 75–65 BCE).[97]

The Indo-Scythians were subjugated by the Kushan Empire's Kujula Kadphises (1st c. CE) or Kanishka (2nd c. CE).[o] The Saka continued to govern as satraps,[p] forming the Northern Satraps and Western Satraps. The power of the Saka rulers began to decline during the 2nd century CE after the Indo-Scythians were defeated by the Satavahana emperor Gautamiputra Satakarni.[100][101] Indo-Scythian rule in the northwestern subcontinent ended when the last Western Satrap, Rudrasimha III, was defeated by the Gupta emperor Chandragupta II in 395 CE.[102][103]

Establishment of the Kushan Empire (1st. c. CE)

[edit]

The Greater Yuezhi initially migrated northwest into the Ili Valley (on the modern borders of China and Kazakhstan), where they reportedly displaced elements of the Sakas. They in turn were driven from the Ili Valley by the Wusun and migrated southward to Sogdia and later settled in Bactria.

During the 1st century BC, one of the five major Greater Yuezhi tribes in Bactria, the Kushanas,[q] began to subsume the other tribes and neighbouring peoples. The subsequent Kushan Empire (30–375 CE), at its peak in the 3rd century CE, stretched from Turfan in the Tarim Basin in the north to Pataliputra on the Gangetic plain of India in the south.

The Kushans, one of the five Yuezhi-tribes, conquered Bactria after having been defeated by the Xiongnu and forced to retreat from the Central Asian steppes. The Yuezhi fragmented the region of Bactria into five distinct territories, with each tribe of the Yuezhi assuming dominion over a separate kingdom.[104] However, a century after this division, Kujula Kadphises of the Kushan tribe emerged victorious by destroying the other four Yuezhi tribes and consolidating his reign as king.[105] Kujula then invaded Parthia and annexed the upper reaches of the Kabul River before further conquering Jibin.[106]

In 78 CE the Indo-Parthians seceded Gandhara to the Kushans with Kujula Kadphises son Vima Takto succeeding the Apracharaja Sases in Taxila and further conquering Tianzhu (India) before installing a general as a satrap.[107][108]

Kushan Buddhist Gandhāran culture and society

[edit]

According to the Xiyu Zhuan, the inhabitants residing in the upper reaches of the Kabul River were extremely wealthy and excelled in commerce, with their cultural practices bearing resemblance to those observed in Tianzhu (India). However, the text also characterises them as weak and easily conquered with their political allegiance never being constant.[109] Over time, the region underwent successive annexations by Tianzhu, Jibin, and Parthia during periods of their respective strength, only to be lost when these powers experienced a decline.[110] The Xiyu Zhuan describes Tianzhu's customs as bearing similarities to that of the Yuezhi and the inhabitants riding on elephants in warfare.[111]

The Kushan period is considered the Golden Period of Gandhara.[112] Peshawar Valley and Taxila are littered with ruins of stupas and monasteries of this period. Gandharan art flourished and produced some of the best pieces of sculpture from the Indian subcontinent. Gandhara's culture peaked during the reign of the great Kushan king Kanishka the Great (127 CE – 150 CE). The cities of Taxila (Takṣaśilā) at Sirsukh and Purushapura (modern-day Peshawar) reached new heights. Purushapura along with Mathura became the capital of the great empire stretching from Central Asia to Northern India with Gandhara being in the midst of it. Emperor Kanishka was a great patron of the Buddhist faith; Buddhism spread from India to Central Asia and the Far East across Bactria and Sogdia, where his empire met the Han Empire of China. Buddhist art spread from Gandhara to other parts of Asia. In Gandhara, Mahayana Buddhism flourished and Buddha was represented in human form. Under the Kushans new Buddhist stupas were built and old ones were enlarged. Huge statues of the Buddha were erected in monasteries and carved into the hillsides. Kanishka also built the 400-foot Kanishka stupa at Peshawar. This tower was reported by Chinese monks Faxian, Song Yun, and Xuanzang who visited the country. The stupa was built during the Kushan era to house Buddhist relics and was among the tallest buildings in the ancient world.[113][114][115]

Kidarites (4th-5th c. CE)

[edit]

The Kidarites conquered Peshawar and parts of the northwest Indian subcontinent including Gandhara probably sometime between 390 and 410 from Kushan empire,[116] around the end of the rule of Gupta Emperor Chandragupta II or beginning of the rule of Kumaragupta I.[117] It is probably the rise of the Hephthalites and the defeats against the Sasanians which pushed the Kidarites into northern India. Their last ruler in Gandhara was Kandik, c.500 CE.

Alchon Huns (5th-6th c. CE)

[edit]

Around 430 King Khingila, the most notable Alchon ruler, emerged and took control of the routes across the Hindu Kush from the Kidarites.[r][118][119][120] Coins of the Alchons rulers Khingila and Mehama were found at the Buddhist monastery of Mes Aynak, southeast of Kabul, confirming the Alchon presence in this area around 450–500 CE.[121] The numismatic evidence as well as the so-called "Hephthalite bowl" from Gandhara, now in the British Museum, suggests a period of peaceful coexistence between the Kidarites and the Alchons, as it features two Kidarite noble hunters, together with two Alchon hunters and one of the Alchons inside a medallion.[122] At one point, the Kidarites withdrew from Gandhara, and the Alchons took over their mints from the time of Khingila.[122]

The silver bowl in the British Museum
Alchon horseman.[122]
The so-called "Hephthalite bowl" from Gandhara, features two Kidarite hunters wearing characteristic crowns, as well as two Alchon hunters (one of them shown here, with skull deformation), suggesting a period of peaceful coexistence between the two entities.[122] Swat District, Pakistan, 460–479 CE. British Museum.[123][124]

The Alchons undertook the mass destruction of Buddhist monasteries and stupas at Taxila, a high centre of learning, which never recovered from the destruction.[125][126] Virtually all of the Alchon coins found in the area of Taxila were found in the ruins of burned down monasteries, where some of the invaders died alongside local defenders during the wave of destructions.[125] It is thought that the Kanishka stupa, one of the most famous and tallest buildings in antiquity, was destroyed by them during their invasion of the area in the 460s CE. The Mankiala stupa was also vandalised during their invasions.[127]

Mihirakula in particular is remembered by Buddhist sources to have been a "terrible persecutor of their religion" in Gandhara.[128] During the reign of Mihirakula, over one thousand Buddhist monasteries throughout Gandhara are said to have been destroyed.[129] In particular, the writings of Chinese monk Xuanzang from 630 CE explained that Mihirakula ordered the destruction of Buddhism and the expulsion of monks.[130] The Buddhist art of Gandhara, in particular Greco-Buddhist art, became extinct around this period. When Xuanzang visited Gandhara in c.630 CE, he reported that Buddhism had drastically declined in favour of Shaivism and that most of the monasteries were deserted and left in ruins.[131] It is also noted by Kalhana that Brahmins of Gandhara accepted from Mihirakula gifts of Agraharams.[132] Kalhana also noted in his Rajatarangini how Mihirakula oppressed local Brahmins of South Asia and imported Gandharan Brahmins into Kashmir and India and states that he had given thousands of villages to these Brahmins in Kashmir.[133][134]

Turk (7th-9th c. CE) and Hindu (9th-11th c. CE) Shahis

[edit]
Horseman on a coin of Spalapati, i.e. the "War-lord" of the Shahis. The headgear has been interpreted as a turban.[135]

The Turk Shahis ruled Gandhara until 843 CE when they were overthrown by the Hindu Shahis. The Hindu Shahis are believed to belong to the Uḍi/Oḍi tribe, namely the people of Oddiyana in Gandhara.[136][137]

The history of the Hindu Shahis begins in 843 CE with Kallar deposing the last Turk Shahi ruler, Lagaturman. Samanta succeeded him, and it was during his reign that the region of Kabul was lost to the Persianate Saffarid empire.[138] Lalliya replaced Samanta soon after and re-conquered Kabul whilst also subduing the region of Zabulistan.[139][140] He is additionally noteworthy for coming into conflict with Samkaravarman of the Utpala dynasty, resulting in his victory and the latter's death in Hazara and was the first Shahi noted by Kalhana. He is depicted as a great ruler with strength to the standard where kings of other regions would seek shelter in his capital of Udabhanda, a change from the previous capital of Kabul.[141][142] Bhimadeva, the next most notable ruler, is most significant for vanquishing the Samanid Empire in Ghazni and Kabul in response to their conquests,[143] his grand-daughter Didda was also the last ruler of the Lohara dynasty. Jayapala then gained control and was brought into conflict with the newly formed Ghaznavid Empire, however, he was eventually defeated. During his rule and that of his son and successor, Anandapala, the kingdom of Lahore was conquered. The following Shahi rulers all resisted the Ghaznavids but were ultimately unsuccessful, resulting in the downfall of the empire in 1026 CE.

End of geographical denotation

[edit]
Many stupas, such as the Shingerdar stupa in Ghalegay, are scattered throughout the region near Peshawar.

Gandhara as a geographical term faded into obscurity after the Ghaznavid rule (1026–1186). The area was subsequently ruled by Islamic dynasties and states, starting with the Ghurid dynasty (786–1215), who started their invasion of the subcontinent in 1175. Thereafter the area was part of the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526), the Mughal Empire (1526–1857), and the British Raj (1858–1947). Since 1947 it belongs to Pakistan.

Culture

[edit]

Language

[edit]

Gandhara's language was a Prakrit or "Middle Indo-Aryan" dialect, usually called Gāndhārī.[144] Under the Kushan Empire, Gāndhārī spread into adjoining regions of South and Central Asia.[144] It used the Kharosthi script, which is derived from the Aramaic script, and it died out about in the 4th century CE.[144][145]

Linguistic evidence links some groups of the Dardic languages with Gandhari.[146][147][148] The Kohistani languages, now all being displaced from their original homelands, were once more widespread in the region and most likely descend from the ancient dialects of the region of Gandhara.[149][150] The last to disappear was Tirahi, still spoken some years ago in a few villages in the vicinity of Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan, by descendants of migrants expelled from Tirah by the Afridi Pashtuns in the 19th century.[151] Georg Morgenstierne claimed that Tirahi is "probably the remnant of a dialect group extending from Tirah through the Peshawar district into Swat and Dir".[152] Nowadays, it must be entirely extinct and the region is now dominated by Iranian languages brought in by later immigrations, such as Pashto.[151] Among the modern day Indo-Aryan languages still spoken today, Torwali shows the closest linguistic affinity possible to Niya, a dialect of Gāndhārī.[150][153]

Religion

[edit]
Maitreya Bodhisattva, Gautama Buddha, and Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva. 2nd–3rd century CE, Gandhāra.
Bronze statue of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva. Fearlessness mudrā. 3rd century CE, Gandhāra.

Mahāyāna Buddhism

[edit]

As per Pali sources, Buddhism first reached Gandhara following the Third Buddhist council which was held in Pataliputra during the reign of Ashoka in the third-century BCE.[154] Various monks were dispatched to different parts of the empire and the missionary dispatched to Gandhara specifically was Majjhantika who originated from the city of Varanasi in India.[155]

Mahāyāna Pure Land sutras were brought from the Gandhāra region to China as early as 147 CE, when the Kushan monk Lokakṣema began translating some of the first Buddhist sutras into Chinese.[156] The earliest of these translations show evidence of having been translated from the Gāndhārī language.[157] Lokakṣema translated important Mahāyāna sūtras such as the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, as well as rare, early Mahāyāna sūtras on topics such as samādhi, and meditation on the Buddha Akṣobhya. Lokaksema's translations continue to provide insight into the early period of Mahāyāna Buddhism. This corpus of texts often includes and emphasises ascetic practices forest dwelling, and absorption in states of meditative concentration:[158]

Paul Harrison has worked on some of the texts that are arguably the earliest versions we have of the Mahāyāna sūtras, those translated into Chinese in the last half of the second century AD by the Indo-Scythian translator Lokakṣema. Harrison points to the enthusiasm in the Lokakṣema sūtra corpus for the extra ascetic practices, for dwelling in the forest, and above all for states of meditative absorption (samādhi). Meditation and meditative states seem to have occupied a central place in early Mahāyāna, certainly because of their spiritual efficacy but also because they may have given access to fresh revelations and inspiration.

Some scholars believe that the Mahāyāna Longer Sukhāvatīvyūha Sūtra was compiled in the age of the Kushan Empire in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE, by order of Mahīśāsaka bhikṣus which flourished in the Gandhāra region.[159][160] However, it is likely that the longer Sukhāvatīvyūha owes greatly to the Mahāsāṃghika-Lokottaravāda sect as well for its compilation, and in this sutra, there are many elements in common with the Lokottaravādin Mahāvastu.[159] There are also images of Amitābha Buddha with the bodhisattvas Avalokiteśvara and Mahāsthāmaprāpta which were made in Gandhāra during the Kushan era.[161]

The Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa records that Kaniṣka of the Kushan Empire presided over the establishment of the Mahāyāna Prajñāpāramitā teachings in the northwest.[162] Tāranātha wrote that in this region, 500 bodhisattvas attended the council at Jālandhra monastery during the time of Kaniṣka, suggesting some institutional strength for Mahāyāna in the north-west during this period.[162] Edward Conze goes further to say that Prajñāpāramitā had great success in the north-west during the Kushan period, and may have been the "fortress and hearth" of early Mahāyāna, but not its origin, which he associates with the Mahāsāṃghika branch of Buddhism.[163]

Other religions

[edit]

Zoroastrianism also was present in Gandhara since the Persian conquest,[155] likely continuing to the reign of Ashoka and subsequently: some scholars have speculated that its presence may have influenced the development of unique aspects of Mahayana Buddhism in Gandhara.[164]

Gandhara, especially Taxila, during Kushan times also played an influential role in the development of arts and culture of the Hindu synthesis,[165] as the region's artistic traditions were influential to some of the early depictions of deities in Hindu art.[166][167]

Art

[edit]
Lid with seated male figure, Gandhara. (1st–2nd century)

Gandhāra is noted for the distinctive Gandhāra style of Buddhist art, which shows the influence of Hellenistic and Eastern Indo-Aryan influences from the Gangetic Valley.[168] The Gandhāran art flourished and achieved its peak during the Kushan period, from the 1st to the 5th centuries, but it declined and was destroyed after the invasion of the Alchon Huns in the 5th century.

Siddhārtha shown as a bejewelled prince (before Siddhārtha renounces palace life) is a common motif.[169] Stucco, as well as stone, were widely used by sculptors in Gandhara for the decoration of monastic and cult buildings.[169][170] Buddhist imagery combined with some artistic elements from the cultures of the Hellenistic world. An example is the youthful Buddha, his hair in wavy curls, similar to statutes of Apollo.[169] Sacred artworks and architectural decorations used limestone for stucco composed by a mixture of local crushed rocks (i.e. schist and granite) which resulted compatible with the outcrops located in the mountains northwest of Islamabad.[171]

The artistic traditions of Gandhara art can be divided into the following phases:

Rediscovery

[edit]

By the time Gandhara had been absorbed into the Ghaznavid Empire empire (977–1186) of Mahmud of Ghazni, Buddhist buildings were already in ruins and Gandhara's art had been forgotten. After Al-Biruni, the Kashmiri writer Kalhaṇa wrote his book Rajatarangini in 1151. He recorded some events that took place in Gandhara and provided details about its last royal dynasty and capital Udabhandapura.

In the 19th century, British soldiers and administrators started taking an interest in the ancient history of the Indian Subcontinent. In the 1830s coins of the post-Ashoka period were discovered, and in the same period, Chinese travelogues were translated. Charles Masson, James Prinsep, and Alexander Cunningham deciphered the Kharosthi script in 1838. Chinese records provided locations and site plans for Buddhist shrines. Along with the discovery of coins, these records provided clues necessary to piece together the history of Gandhara. In 1848 Cunningham found Gandhara sculptures north of Peshawar. He also identified the site of Taxila in the 1860s. From then on a large number of Buddhist statues were discovered in the Peshawar valley.

Archaeologist John Marshall excavated at Taxila between 1912 and 1934. He discovered separate Greek, Parthian, and Kushan cities and a large number of stupas and monasteries. These discoveries helped to piece together much more of the chronology of the history of Gandhara and its art.

After 1947 Ahmed Hassan Dani and the Archaeology Department at the University of Peshawar made several discoveries in the Peshawar and Swat Valley. Excavation of many of the sites of the Gandhara Civilization is being done by researchers from Peshawar and several universities around the world.

Major cities

[edit]

Major cities of ancient Gandhara are as follows:

Notable people

[edit]
[edit]
  • Gandhara:Buddha no Seisen is an action RPG released in Japan in 1987.[172]
  • "Gandhara" is a 1978 song by Japanese rock band Godiego, serving as their 7th single.
  • Gandhara is a fictional Buddhist pacifist organisation in the Japanese manga series Shaman King.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. 1 2 [33]: "...we estimate the date of admixture into the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age individuals from the Swat District of northernmost South Asia to be, on average, 26 generations before the date that they lived, corresponding to a 95% confidence interval of ~1900 to 1500 BCE..."
  2. IAST: gandhārasvāmin
  3. Dani & Bernard (1994, p. 73): "Then crossing the mountains Alexander descended to a city called Arigaeum [identified with Nawagai], and found that this had been set on fire by the inhabitants, who had afterwards fled."
  4. Dani & Bernard (1994, p. 74): "Alexander then crossed the River Guraeus (the Panchkora, in Dir District). Beyond the Karmani pass lies the Talash valley. The Assacenians, identified with the Asvakas of Sanskrit literature, tried to defend themselves."
  5. Dani & Bernard (1994): "Alexander while reconnoitring the fortifications, and unable to fix on a plan of attack, since nothing less than a vast mole, necessary for bringing up his engines to the walls, would suffice to fill up the chasms, was wounded from the ramparts by an arrow which chanced to hit him in the calf of the leg"
  6. Dani & Bernard (1994, p. 75): "When many were thus wounded and not a few killed, the women, taking the arms of the fallen, fought side by side with the men for the imminence of the danger and the great interests at stake forced them to do violence to their nature, and to take an active part in the defence."
  7. Dani & Bernard (1994, p. 72): "The ruler of Taxila wanted to satisfy his own grudge against Porus"
  8. Dani & Bernard (1994, p. 72): "Taxiles and the others came to meet him, bringing gifts reckoned of value among the Indians. They presented him with the twenty-five elephants....and when they reached the Indus, they were to make all necessary preparations for the passage of the army. Taxiles and the other chiefs marched with them."
  9. Some cities were still controlled by Greek kings such as Hermaeus Soter (90–70 BC) in what is today Kabul.
  10. Neelis (2010, p. 118): "The domain of the Apracas was probably centred in Bajaur and extended to Swat, Gandhara, Taxila and other parts of Eastern Afghanistan."
  11. Neelis (2010, p. 119): "The apracas were also connected by marital alliance with the Odi kings in the Swat valley since a royal relative and officer named Suhasoma in a Buddhist reliquary inscription of Senavarman was married to Vasavadatta."
  12. "As a result, the Indo-Greek kingdom emerged to the south but it did not exist long and was soon replaced by the Indo-Parthian kingdom."[79]
  13. Dà Yuèzhī 大月氏
  14. Xiǎo Yuèzhī 小月氏
  15. Kharapallana and Vanaspara are known from an inscription discovered in Sarnath and dated to the third year of Kanishka, in which they pledged allegiance to the Kushanas.[98]
  16. "The titles "Kshatrap" and "Mahakshatrapa" certainly show that the Western Kshatrapas were originally feudatories"[99]
  17. Chinese: 貴霜; pinyin: Guìshuāng
  18. Neelis (2010, p. 162): "The Alchon Huns....established themselves as overlords of northwestern India, and directly contributed to the downfall of the Guptas"

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Pizarro 2025, pp. 31–32.
  2. 1 2 Behrendt 2007, p. 3.
  3. Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 54.
  4. Hansen 2000, p. 377.
  5. Samad 2011, pp. 1–2.
  6. Neelis 2010, p. 232–233.
  7. Eggermont 1975, pp. 175–177.
  8. 1 2 Olivieri et al. 2019, p. 139.
  9. History Of Ancient And Early Medieval India From The Stone Age To The 12th Century. p. 604. The Behistun inscription of the Achaemenid emperor Darius indicates that Gandhara was conquered by the Persians in the later part of the 6th century BCE.
  10. Karttunen, Klaus (1989). India in Early Greek Literature. Finnish Oriental Society. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-951-9380-10-0.
  11. "The early history of India from 600 B.C. to the Muhammadan conquest, : including the invasion of Alexander the Great : Smith, Vincent A. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming". Internet Archive. pp. 55–61. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
  12. "The early history of India from 600 B.C. to the Muhammadan conquest, : including the invasion of Alexander the Great : Smith, Vincent A. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming". Internet Archive. pp. 122–125. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
  13. "UW Press: Ancient Buddhist Scrolls from Gandhara". Retrieved April 2018.
  14. Some sounds are omitted in the writing of Old Persian and are shown with a raised letter. Old Persian p. 164Old Persian p. 13. In particular, Old Persian nasals such as "n" were omitted in writing before consonants Old Persian p. 17Old Persian p.25
  15. Thomas Watters (1904). "On Yuan Chwang's travels in India, 629–645 A.D." Royal Asiatic Society. p. 200. Taken as Gandhavat the name is explained as meaning hsiang-hsing or "scent-action" from the word gandha which means scent, small, perfume. At the Internet Archive.
  16. Adrian Room (1997). Placenames of the World. McFarland. ISBN 9780786418145. Kandahar. City, south central Afghanistan At Google Books.
  17. Macdonell, Arthur Anthony; Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1995). Vedic Index of Names and Subjects. Vol. 1. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 219. ISBN 9788120813328. From Google Books.
  18. "Gandara – Livius".
  19. Herodotus (1920). "3.102.1". Histories. "4.44.2". Histories (in Greek). Translated by A. D. Godley. "3.102.1". Histories. "4.44.2". Histories. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. At the Perseus Project.
  20. Perfrancesco Callieri, INDIA ii. Historical Geography, Encyclopaedia Iranica, 15 December 2004.
  21. Herodotus Book III, 89–95
  22. University Of Pittsburgh Press U.S.A. (1961). Cultural History Of Kapisa And Gandhara. pp. 12–13. The Ramayana places Gandhara on both banks of the Indus....According to Strabo, Gandharites lay along the river Kophes, between the Khoaspes and the Indus. Ptolemy places Gandhara between Suastos (Swat) and the Indus including both banks of Koa immediately above its junction with the Indus.
  23. University Of Pittsburg Press U.S.A. (1961). Cultural History Of Kapisa And Gandhara. p. 12. The Ramayana places Gandhara on both banks of the Indus with its two royal cities Pushkalavati for the west and Takshasila for the east.
  24. "Decorative Motifs on Pedestals of Gandharan Sculptures: A Case Study of Peshawar Museum" (PDF). p. 173. While according to the recent research, the cultural influence of Gandhāra even reached up to the valley of the Jhelum River in the east (Dar 2007: 54-55).
  25. "The geography of Gandharan art" (PDF). p. 6. although Saifur Rahman Dar sought in 2007 to extend the geographical frame to the left bank of the Jhelum river, on account of six Buddhist images discovered at the sites of Mehlan, Patti Koti, Burarian, Cheyr and Qila Ram Kot (Dar 2007: 45-59), evidence remains insufficient to support his conclusions.
  26. Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 1. Here he had to depend upon and appoint Indians as his satraps, viz., Ambhi, king of Taxila, to rule from the Indus to the Hydaspes (Jhelum).
  27. Bryant 2002, p. 138.
  28. "The Oxford history of India, from the earliest times to the end of 1911 : Smith, Vincent Arthur, 1848-1920 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming". Internet Archive. p. 59. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
  29. Wannaporn Rienjang and Peter Stewart (15 March 2019). The Geography Of Gandhāran Art: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop of the Gandhāra Connections Project, University of Oxford, 22nd-23rd March, 2018. p. 8. The Greater Gandhara of philologists, or at least of Salomon, extends beyond the western foothills of the Hindu Kush and the Karakorum Highway to include parts of Bactria and even parts of the region around the Tarim Basin. As Salomon specifies in The Buddhist Literature from Ancient Gandhara, 'thus Greater Gandhara can be understood as a primarily linguistic rather than a political term, that is, as comprising the regions where Gandharl was the indigenous or adopted language'. Accordingly, it includes places such as Bamiyan where over two hundred of fragments of manuscripts in Gandharl have been discovered along with a larger group of manuscripts in Sanskrit.
  30. Wannaporn Rienjang and Peter Stewart (15 March 2019). The Geography Of Gandhāran Art: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop of the Gandhāra Connections Project, University of Oxford, 22nd-23rd March, 2018. pp. 7–8. Other scholars had alternately equated Jibin with Kapisa and more frequently with Kashmir. Kuwayama concludes that while this identification might prove correct for some sources, the Gaoseng zhuan s fourth and fifth century placement of Jibin coincides clearly with the narrower geographical definition of Gandhara.
  31. Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 38. Udichya and Prachya are the two broad divisions of the country mentioned by Panini, and these terms occur in connection with the linguistic forms known to the eastern and northern grammarians. The Udichya country included Gandhara and Vahika, the latter comprising Madra and Usinara.
  32. Coningham, Robin, and Mark Manuel, (2008). "Kashmir and the Northwest Frontier", Asia, South, in Encyclopedia of Archaeology 2008, Elsevier, p. 740.
  33. Narasimhan et al. 2019, p. 11.
  34. Macdonell, Arthur Anthony; Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1912). Vedic Index of Names and Subjects. John Murray. pp. 218–219.
  35. Chattopadhyaya, Sudhakar (1978). Reflections on the Tantras. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 4.
  36. "Rigveda 1.126:7, English translation by Ralph TH Griffith".
  37. Arthur Anthony Macdonell (1997). A History of Sanskrit Literature. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 130–. ISBN 978-81-208-0095-3.
  38. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. University Press. 1889. p. 212.
  39. 1 2 Raychaudhuri 1953, p. 59-62.
  40. 1 2 Raychaudhuri 1953, p. 146-147.
  41. Prakash, Buddha (1951). "Poros". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 32 (1): 198–233. JSTOR 41784590. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
  42. Macdonell & Keith 1912, p. 218-219, 432.
  43. Higham, Charles (2014), Encyclopedia of Ancient Asian Civilizations, Infobase Publishing, pp. 209–, ISBN 978-1-4381-0996-1
  44. Khoinaijam Rita Devi (1 January 2007). History of ancient India: on the basis of Buddhist literature. Akansha Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-8370-086-3.
  45. 1 2 Sen 1999, p. 116–117.
  46. Philip's Atlas of World History Archived 2018-10-17 at the Wayback Machine (1999)
  47. O'Brien, Patrick Karl (2002). Atlas of World History. Oxford University Press. p. 43. ISBN 9780195219210.
  48. Schwartzberg, Joseph E. (1978). A Historical atlas of South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 15. ISBN 0226742210.
  49. André-Salvini, Béatrice (2005). Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24731-4.
  50. Mccrindle, J. W. Ancient India As Described By Megasthenes And Arrian by Mccrindle, J. W. p. 109. The Persians indeed summoned the Hydrakai from India to serve as mercenaries, but they did not lead an army into the country and only approached its borders when Kyros marched against the Massagatai.
  51. Rafi U. Samad, The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing, 2011, p. 32 ISBN 0875868592
  52. Konow, Sien (1929). Kharoshthi Inscriptions Except Those Of Asoka Vol.ii Part I (1929). p. 18. Buhler had shown that the KharoshthI characters are derived from Aramaic, which Origin of was in common use for official purposes all over the Achaemenian empire during the KharoshthI period when it comprised north-western India... And Buhler is right in assuming that KharoshthI is ' the result of the intercourse between the offices of the Satraps and of the native authorities
  53. O. Bopearachchi, "Premières frappes locales de l'Inde du Nord-Ouest: nouvelles données", in Trésors d'Orient: Mélanges offerts à Rika Gyselen, Fig. 1 CNG Coins
  54. Bopearachchi, Osmund. Coin Production and Circulation in Central Asia and North-West India (Before and after Alexander's Conquest). pp. 300–301.
  55. "US Department of Defense". Archived from the original on 10 June 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2018.
  56. Errington, Elizabeth; Trust, Ancient India and Iran; Museum, Fitzwilliam (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. pp. 57–59. ISBN 9780951839911.
  57. Bopearachchi, Osmund. Coin Production and Circulation in Central Asia and North-West India (Before and after Alexander's Conquest). pp. 308–.
  58. "LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book VII: Chapters 57-137". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 27 January 2024. The Parthians, Chorasmians, Sogdians, Gandarians, and Dadicae in the army had the same equipment as the Bactrians.
  59. "LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book VII: Chapters 57-137". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 27 January 2024. The Parthians and Chorasmians had for their commander Artabazus son of Pharnaces, the Sogdians Azanes son of Artaeus, the Gandarians and Dadicae Artyphius son of Artabanus.
  60. Mccrindle, J. W. Ancient India As Described By Megasthenes And Arrian by Mccrindle, J. W. pp. 179–180. The regions beyond the, river Indus on the west are inhabited, up to the river Kophen, by two Indian tribes, the Astakenoi and the Assakenoi...In the dominions of the Assakanoi there is a great city called Massaka, the seat of the sovereign power which controls the whole realm. And there is an other city, Peukalaitis, which is also of great size and not far from the Indus.
  61. Dani & Bernard 1994, p. 74–75.
  62. Tarn, William Woodthorpe (24 June 2010). The Greeks in Bactria and India. Cambridge University Press. p. 152. ISBN 978-1-108-00941-6. The Mauryan empire proper, north of the line of the Nerbudda and the Vindhya mountains, had pivoted upon three great cities: pataliputra the capital and the seat of the emperor, Taxila the seat of the viceroy of the North West...
  63. Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 3. According to tradition he began by strengthening his position by an alliance with the Himalayan chief Parvataka, as stated in both the Sanskrit and Jaina texts, Mudradkshasa and Parisishtaparvan.
  64. Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 4. The army of Malayaketu (Parvataka) comprised recruits from the following peoples : Khasa, Magadha, Gandhara, Yavana, Saka, Chedi and Huna.
  65. Lahiri, Nayanjot (5 August 2015). Ashoka in Ancient India. Harvard University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-674-91525-1. Ashoka arrived in Taxila at the head of an armed contingent, the swords remained in their scabbards: the citizenry, instead of offering resistance came out of their city and on its roads to welcome him, saying 'we did not want to rebel against the prince.. nor even against King Bundusara; but evil ministers came and oppressed us'
  66. Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 22. In the Gupta epoch, again, some of the provinces were administered by princes of the royal blood designated kumaras. The same was the case in the time of Asoka. Three instances of such Kumara governorship are known from his edicts. Thus one kumara was stationed at Takshasila to govern the frontier province of Gandhara..
  67. Cunningham, Alexander (6 December 2022). Archeological Survey of India: Vol. II. BoD – Books on Demand. p. 90. ISBN 978-3-368-13568-3. ...3/4 of a mile to the north of this place there was a great stupa built by Ashoka
  68. Prakesh, Buddha. "Studies In Indian History And Civilization" (PDF). p. 157. Subhagasena seems to be the successor of Virasena, who came to the throne after Ashoka, according to Taranatha. It appears that after the secession of the north-western half of India from the Maurya empire after the death of Ashoka, Virasena entrenched his hold over it while the other eastern and southern half of the country passed under the domination of Samprati.
  69. Prakesh, Buddha. "Studies In Indian History And Civilization" (PDF). p. 155. Polybius states: "He (Antiochus the Great) crossed the Caucasus and descended into India, renewed his friendship with Sophogsenus the king of the Indians; received more elephants, until he had 150 altogether
  70. Rapson, Edward James; Haig, Sir Wolseley; Burn, Sir Richard; Dodwell, Henry; Wheeler, Sir Robert Eric Mortimer (1968). The Cambridge History of India. CUP Archive. p. 512. ..with whom Antiochus the Great renewed an ancestral relationship in 206 BCE
  71. The Ancient Greco-Bactrian kingdom and Hellenistic Afghanistan Brewminate, Archived 24 September 2021 at the Wayback MachineMatthew A. McIntosh
  72. Cribb, Joe (2005). "The Greek Kingdom of Bactria, its coinage and its collapse". Afghanistan Ancien Carrefour Entre Lʼest et Lʼouest: 1 via Academia.edu.
  73. Mairs, Rachel (2016). "Bactrian or Graeco-Bactrian Kingdom". The Encyclopedia of Empire: 1–4.
  74. "Indo-Greek Campaigns".
  75. The Dynastic Arts of the Kushans, John M. Rosenfield, University of California Press, 1967, p.135
  76. (Imperial Gazetteer, p. 149)
  77. 1 2 Richard Salomon, An Inscribed Silver Buddhist Reliquary of the Time of King Kharaosta and Prince Indravarman, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 116, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1996), pp. 418–452
  78. Ghosh, Suchandra (11 January 2016), "Indo-Parthian Kingdom", in Dalziel, Nigel; MacKenzie, John M (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Empire, Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 1–2, doi:10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe038, ISBN 978-1-118-45507-4, retrieved 28 January 2023
  79. Ellerbrock 2021, p. 117.
  80. Rezakhani 2017, p. 35.
  81. Olbrycht 2016, p. 25.
  82. Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 215. The interesting additional information we get from these coins is that Sasan, a former associate of Gondophares and afterwards one of his successors in the Taxila region, was the son of Aspa's brother
  83. De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 76. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. and was the residence of a sovereign who ruled over what of old was the kingdom of Porus.
  84. De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 78. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. Phraotes, in answer, said that he was moderate because his wants were few, and that as he was wealthy, he employed his wealth in doing good to his friends, and in subsidizing the barbarians, his neighbours, to prevent them from themselves ravaging, or allowing other barbarians to ravage his territories.
  85. Srinivasan, Doris (30 April 2007). On the Cusp of an Era: Art in the Pre-Kuṣāṇa World. BRILL. p. 107. ISBN 978-90-474-2049-1. Philostratus comments that the people who live between the River Kophen and Taxila have a coinage not of gold and silver but of Orichalcum and black brass. He describes the houses as designed so that if you look at them from the outside, they appear to have only one storey, but if you go inside they have underground rooms as well.
  86. De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 76. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. Taxila was about the size of Ninovoh, walled like a Greek city
  87. De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 77. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. They are taken to the palace. They found the city divided by narrow streets, well-arranged, and reminding them of Athens.
  88. Romila Thapar (2004). Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. University of California Press. p. 221. ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8.
  89. Burton Stein (2010). A History of India. John Wiley & Sons. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-4443-2351-1.
  90. Peter Robb (2011). A History of India. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-230-34549-2.[permanent dead link]
  91. Hermann Kulke; Dietmar Rothermund (2016). A History of India. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-24212-3.
  92. Di Castro, Angelo Andrea; Hope, Colin A. (2005). "The Barbarisation of Bactria". Cultural Interaction in Afghanistan c 300 BCE to 300 CE. Melbourne: Monash University Press. pp. 1–18, map visible online page 2 of Hestia, a Tabula Iliaca and Poseidon's trident. ISBN 978-1876924393.
  93. Dean, Riaz (2022). The Stone Tower: Ptolemy, the Silk Road, and a 2,000-Year-Old Riddle. Delhi: Penguin Viking. pp. 73–81 (Ch.7, Migration of the Yuezhi). ISBN 978-0670093625.
  94. The Grandeur of Gandhara, Rafi-us Samad, Algora Publishing, 2011, p. 64-67
  95. "Arrian: Anabasis Alexandri: Book VIII (Indica); Section V". Ancient History Sourcebooks. Fordham University. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  96. Ptolemy vi, xiii (1932), p. 143.
  97. Suchandra Ghosh (11 January 2016). "Indo-Scythian (Saka) Kingdom". In Nigel Dalziel, John M MacKenzie (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Empire. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe067. ISBN 978-1-118-45507-4. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  98. A Catalogue of the Indian Coins in the British Museum. Andhras etc. Rapson, p. ciii
  99. Rapson, Coins of the British Museum, p. cv
  100. World history from Early Times to AD 2000 by B. V. Rao, p. 97
  101. A Brief History of India, by Alain Daniélou p. 136
  102. India in a Globalised World by Sagarika Dutt, p. 24
  103. Ancient India by Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, p. 234
  104. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. Formerly, when the Yuezhi had been destroyed by the Xiongnu, they moved to Daxia and divided the country into five Xihou.
  105. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. More than a hundred years later, the xihou of guishuang(kushan) named Qiujiuque(Kujula) attacked and destroyed the other four xihou and established himself king.
  106. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. This king invaded Anxi(Parthia) and took Gaofu(Kabul) and destroyed Puda and Jibin.
  107. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. and his son yangouzhen(Vima takto) succeeded him as king. He in his turn destroyed Tianzhu and installed a general there to control it.
  108. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. occupied Gandhara around 60 CE and Taxila by 78 CE
  109. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. The state of Gaofu to the southwest of Da Yuezhi and is also a large state. Its way of life resembles that of Tianzhu and the people are weak and easily conquered. They excel in commerce, and internally they are very wealthy. Their political allegiance has never been constant.
  110. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. The three states of Tianzhu Jibin and Anxi had possessed it when they were strong and have lost it when they were weak.
  111. 余太山著 (1 July 2021). A CONCISE COMMENTARY ON MONOGRAPHS ON THE WESTERN REGIONS IN THE OFFICIAL HISTORY BOOKS OF THE WESTERN & EASTERN HAN, WEI, JIN, SOUTHERN & NORTHERN DYNASTIES. Beijing Book Co. Inc. ISBN 978-7-100-19365-8. its customs are the same as those of Yuezhi...the inhabitants ride on elephants in warfare
  112. Jamil 2017, p. 94.
  113. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. p. 180. ISBN 9780984404308.
  114. Marshall, John H. (1909): "Archaeological Exploration in India, 1908–9." (Section on: "The stūpa of Kanishka and relics of the Buddha"). Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1909, pp. 1056–1061.
  115. Rai Govind Chandra (1 January 1979). Indo-Greek Jewellery. Abhinav Publications. pp. 82–. ISBN 978-81-7017-088-4. Retrieved 13 December 2012.
  116. Dani, Ahmad Hasan; Litvinsky, B. A. (1996). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The crossroads of civilizations, A.D. 250 to 750. UNESCO. p. 122. ISBN 9789231032110.
  117. "The entry of the Kidarites into India may firmly be placed some time round about the end of the rule of Chandragupta II or beginning of the rule of Kumaragupta I (circa 410–420 a.d.)" in Gupta, Parmeshwari Lal; Kulashreshtha, Sarojini (1994). Kuṣāṇa Coins and History. D.K. Printworld. p. 122. ISBN 9788124600177.
  118. Bakker, Hans (2017), Monuments of Hope, Gloom and Glory in the Age of the Hunnic Wars: 50 years that changed India (484–534), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Section 4, ISBN 978-90-6984-715-3, archived from the original on 11 January 2020, retrieved 1 May 2021
  119. Atreyi Biswas (1971). The Political History of the Hūṇas in India. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. ISBN 9780883863015.
  120. Upendra Thakur (1967). The Hūṇas in India. Chowkhamba Prakashan. pp. 52–55.
  121. Alram, Michael (2014). "From the Sasanians to the Huns New Numismatic Evidence from the Hindu Kush". The Numismatic Chronicle. 174: 274. JSTOR 44710198.
  122. 1 2 3 4 ALRAM, MICHAEL (2014). "From the Sasanians to the Huns New Numismatic Evidence from the Hindu Kush". The Numismatic Chronicle. 174: 274–275. ISSN 0078-2696. JSTOR 44710198.
  123. Iaroslav Lebedynsky, "Les Nomades", p172.
  124. "British Museum notice". British Museum. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
  125. 1 2 Ghosh, Amalananda (1965). Taxila. CUP Archive. p. 791.
  126. Upinder Singh (2017). Political Violence in Ancient India. Harvard University Press. p. 241. ISBN 9780674981287.
  127. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. ISBN 9780984404308. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
  128. Grousset, Rene (1970). The Empire of the Steppes. Rutgers University Press. pp. 69–71. ISBN 0-8135-1304-9.
  129. Behrendt, Kurt A. (2004). Handbuch der Orientalistik. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 9789004135956.
  130. Upinder Singh (2017). Political Violence in Ancient India. Harvard University Press. pp. 241–242. ISBN 9780674981287.
  131. Ann Heirman; Stephan Peter Bumbacher (11 May 2007). The Spread of Buddhism. Leiden: BRILL. p. 60. ISBN 978-90-474-2006-4.
  132. Thakur Upender (1967). The Hunas In India Vol-lviii (1967) Ac 4776. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office. p. 267. The Brahmanas of Gandhara accepted from him gift of agraharas; they no doubt, too, were similar as his own and were the meanest Brahmanas.
  133. "Modi_History of the Huns.pdf" (PDF). p. 342. It is the same Mihirkula who is referred to in the Rajatarangini, the History of Kashmir, by Kalhana, as a wicked king who was opposed to the local Brahmins and·who imported Gandhara Brahmins into Kashmir and India.
  134. Kalhana, Jogesh Chunder Dutt. Rajatarangini of Kalhana - English - Jogesh Chunder Dutt Volumes 1 & 2. p. 21. He gave thousands of villages in Vijayeahvara to the Brahmanas of Gandhara.
  135. Rehman 1976, p. 187 and Pl. V B., "the horseman is shown wearing a turban-like head-gear with a small globule on the top".
  136. Rahman, Abdul (2002). "New Light on the Khingal, Turk and the Hindu Sahis" (PDF). Ancient Pakistan. XV: 37–42. The Hindu Śāhis were therefore neither Bhattis, or Janjuas, nor Brahmans. They were simply Uḍis/Oḍis. It can now be seen that the term Hindu Śāhi is a misnomer and, based as it is merely upon religious discrimination, should be discarded and forgotten. The correct name is Uḍi or Oḍi Śāhi dynasty.
  137. Meister, Michael W. (2005). "The Problem of Platform Extensions at Kafirkot North" (PDF). Ancient Pakistan. XVI: 41–48. Rehman (2002: 41) makes a good case for calling the Hindu Śāhis by a more accurate name, "Uḍi Śāhis".
  138. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. pp. 96–101.
  139. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. p. 110.
  140. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. pp. 110–111.
  141. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. p. 107.
  142. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. p. 113.
  143. The Last Two Dynasties of The Shāhis. 1976. pp. 128–130.
  144. 1 2 3 Foundation, Encyclopaedia Iranica. "GĀNDHĀRĪ LANGUAGE". iranicaonline.org. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
  145. Rhie, Marylin Martin (15 July 2019). Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia, Volume 2 The Eastern Chin and Sixteen Kingdoms Period in China and Tumshuk, Kucha and Karashahr in Central Asia (2 vols). BRILL. p. 327. ISBN 978-90-04-39186-4.
  146. Dani, Ahmad Hasan (2001). History of Northern Areas of Pakistan: Upto 2000 A.D. Sang-e-Meel Publications. pp. 64–67. ISBN 978-969-35-1231-1.
  147. Saxena, Anju (12 May 2011). Himalayan Languages: Past and Present. Walter de Gruyter. p. 35. ISBN 978-3-11-089887-3.
  148. Liljegren, Henrik (26 February 2016). A grammar of Palula. Language Science Press. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-3-946234-31-9. Palula belongs to a group of Indo-Aryan (IA) languages spoken in the Hindukush region that are often referred to as "Dardic" languages... It has been and is still disputed to what extent this primarily geographically defined grouping has any real classificatory validity... On the one hand, Strand suggests that the term should be discarded altogether, holding that there is no justification whatsoever for any such grouping (in addition to the term itself having a problematic history of use), and prefers to make a finer classification of these languages into smaller genealogical groups directly under the IA heading, a classification we shall return to shortly... Zoller identifies the Dardic languages as the modern successors of the Middle Indo-Aryan (MIA) language Gandhari (also Gandhari Prakrit), but along with Bashir, Zoller concludes that the family tree model alone will not explain all the historical developments.
  149. Cacopardo, Alberto M.; Cacopardo, Augusto S. (2001). Gates of Peristan: History, Religion and Society in the Hindu Kush. IsIAO. p. 253. ISBN 978-88-6323-149-6. ...This leads us to the conclusion that the ancient dialects of the Peshawar District, the country between Tirah and Swât, must have belonged to the Tirahi-Kohistani type and that the westernmost Dardic language, Pashai, which probably had its ancient centre in Laghmân, has enjoyed a comparatively independent position since early times". …Today the Kohistâni languages descendent from the ancient dialects that developed in these valleys have all been displaced from their original homelands, as described below.
  150. 1 2 Burrow, T. (1936). "The Dialectical Position of the Niya Prakrit". Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London. 8 (2/3): 419–435. ISSN 1356-1898. JSTOR 608051. ... It might be going too far to say that Torwali is the direct lineal descendant of the Niya Prakrit, but there is no doubt that out of all the modern languages, it shows the closest resemblance to it. A glance at the map in the Linguistic Survey of India shows that the area at present covered by "Kohistani" is the nearest to that area around Peshawar, where, as stated above, there is most reason to believe was the original home of the Niya Prakrit. That conclusion, which was reached for other reasons, is thus confirmed by the distribution of the modern dialects.
  151. 1 2 Dani, Ahmad Hasan (2001). History of Northern Areas of Pakistan: Upto 2000 A.D. Sang-e-Meel Publications. p. 56. ISBN 978-969-35-1231-1. In the Peshawar district, there does not remain any Indian dialect continuing this old Gandhari. The last to disappear was Tirahi, still spoken some years ago in Afghanistan, in the vicinity of Jalalabad, by descendants of migrants expelled from Tirah by the Afridis in the 19th century. Nowadays, it must be entirely extinct and in the NWFP are only to be found modern Iranian languages brought in by later immigrants (Baluch, Pashto) or Indian languages brought in by the paramount political power (Urdu, Panjabi) or by Hindu traders (Hindko).
  152. Jain, Danesh; Cardona, George (26 July 2007). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Routledge. p. 991. ISBN 978-1-135-79710-2.
  153. Salomon, Richard (10 December 1998). Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-19-535666-3.
  154. Lopez, Donald (2014). "Kashmir-Gandhāra". Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism.
  155. 1 2 Wani, Muhammad (2023). The Making of Early Kashmir: Intercultural Networks and Identity Formation. Taylor and Francis. p. 82. ISBN 9781000836554.
  156. "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalogue". www.acmuller.net.
  157. Mukherjee, Bratindra Nath. India in Early Central Asia. 1996. p. 15
  158. Williams, Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. 2008. p. 30
  159. 1 2 Nakamura, Hajime. Indian Buddhism: A Survey With Biographical Notes. 1999. p. 205
  160. Williams, Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. 2008. p. 239
  161. "Gandharan Sculptural Style: The Buddha Image". Archived from the original on 18 December 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  162. 1 2 Ray, Reginald. Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations. 1999. p. 410
  163. Ray, Reginald. Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations. 1999. p. 426
  164. Boyce, Mary; Grenet, F. (2015). A History of Zoroastrianism, Zoroastrianism under Macedonian and Roman Rule. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-29391-5.
  165. Schmidt, Karl J. (2015). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-47681-8. In addition to being a center of religion for Buddhists, as well as Hindus, Taxila was a thriving center for art, culture, and learning.
  166. Srinivasan, Doris Meth (2008). "Hindu Deities in Gandharan art". Gandhara, the Buddhist Heritage of Pakistan: Legends, Monasteries, and Paradise. Kunst- und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Mainz : Verlag Philipp von Zabern. pp. 130–143. ISBN 978-3-8053-3957-5. Gandhara was not cut off from the heartland of early Hinduism in the Gangetic Valley. The two regions shared cultural and political connections and trade relations and this facilitated the adoption and exchange of religious ideas. [...] It is during the Kushan Era that flowering of religious imagery occurred. [...] Gandhara often introduced its own idiosyncratic expression upon the Buddhist and Hindu imagery it had initially come in contact with.
  167. Blurton, T. Richard (1993). Hindu Art. Harvard University Press. pp. 84, 176. ISBN 978-0-674-39189-5. The earliest figures of Shiva which show him in purely human form come from the area of ancient Gandhara [...] Coins from Gandhara of the first century BC show Lakshmi [...] four-armed, on a lotus.
  168. Behrendt, Kurt (2011). Gandharan Buddhism: Archaeology, Art, and Texts. UBC Press. p. 241. ISBN 978-0774841283. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  169. 1 2 3 "Buddhism and Buddhist Art".
  170. Siple, Ella S. (1931). "Stucco Sculpture from Central Asia". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. 59 (342): 140–145. ISSN 0951-0788. JSTOR 864875.
  171. Carlo Rosa; Thomas Theye; Simona Pannuzi (2019). "Geological overwiew of Gandharan sites and petrographical analysis on Gandharan stucco and clay artefacts" (pdf). Restauro Archeologico. 27 (1). Firenze University Press: Abstract. doi:10.13128/RA-25095. ISSN 1724-9686. OCLC 8349098991. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 15 February 2020. on DOAJ
  172. "Gandhara:Buddha no Seisen". Retrieved 21 March 2023.[permanent dead link]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]

33°45′22″N 72°49′45″E / 33.7560°N 72.8291°E / 33.7560; 72.8291